475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8148030)
21. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laboratory evaluation of phosphate ester bonding agents.
Souza MH; Retief DH; Russell CM; Denys FR
Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 8054187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microleakage of a composite inlay system.
Scott JA; Saunders WP; Strang R
Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 1290604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microleakage resistance of glutaraldehyde-containing adhesives.
Crim GA; Schmidt ED
Am J Dent; 1993 Jun; 6(3):142-4. PubMed ID: 8240776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements.
Michelini FS; Belser UC; Scherrer SS; De Rijk WG
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 7575974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microleakage in heat-treated class V resin inlays cemented with five cement systems: an in vitro study.
Macpherson JR; Davis RD; Reagan SE; Gray SE
Gen Dent; 1994; 42(4):310-6; quiz 317-8. PubMed ID: 7835668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts.
Bachicha WS; DiFiore PM; Miller DA; Lautenschlager EP; Pashley DH
J Endod; 1998 Nov; 24(11):703-8. PubMed ID: 9855817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microleakage around glass-ceramic insert restorations luted with a high-viscous or flowable composite.
Salim S; Santini A; Safar KN
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(1):30-8; discussion 39. PubMed ID: 15934683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of gap size and cement type on gingival microleakage in Class V resin composite inlays.
Browning WD; Safirstein J
Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):541-4. PubMed ID: 9477882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Marginal microleakage around class V cavities restored with glass ceramic inserts of different coefficients of thermal expansion.
Tan CL; Santini A
J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15974221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
Payne JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to dentin in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Resch U
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):137-46. PubMed ID: 10530275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays.
Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Microleakage of Gluma Bond, Scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique.
Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Scarbrough AR; Hembree JH
Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2127533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
