These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 814823)
1. The worth of a screening program: an application of a statistical decision model for the benefit evaluation of screening projects. Bay KS; Flathman D; Nestman L Am J Public Health; 1976 Feb; 66(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 814823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative evaluation of a screening program. Grant JA Am J Public Health; 1974 Jan; 64(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 4808610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. General health screening of four-year-olds in a Swedish country. V. A strategy for improving the effectiveness and the cost efficiency of the psychological screening program. Nilsson C; Sundelin C; Vuille JC Acta Paediatr Scand; 1977 May; 66(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 68657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-benefit analysis: a research tool for evaluating innovative health programs. Bootman JL; Rowland C; Wertheimer AI Eval Health Prof; 1979 Jun; 2(2):129-54. PubMed ID: 10308892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cost-benefit model of the Rwanda family planning program]. Rwanda. Office National de la Population ONAPO Imbonezamuryango; 1991 Aug; (21):25-37. PubMed ID: 12317097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using service data: tools for taking action. Management Sciences for Health. Family Planning Management Development Fam Plan Manag; 1992; 1(2):1-12. PubMed ID: 12286869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A lesson for every state from Minnesota's preschool screening program. Lombard TJ J Sch Health; 1980 Oct; 50(8):459-62. PubMed ID: 6451764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making. Proeve M Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 18495947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value for money in the health sector: the contribution of primary health care. Mills A; Drummond M Health Policy Plan; 1987 Jun; 2(2):107-28. PubMed ID: 10312103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ryan White CARE Act Title IV programs: a preliminary characterization of benefits and costs. Abramowitz S; Greene D AIDS Public Policy J; 2005; 20(3-4):108-25. PubMed ID: 17624034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems. Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of an explanation capability for a computer consultation system. Erdman HP Methods Inf Med; 1985 Oct; 24(4):181-91. PubMed ID: 4058315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Do nutrition programs make a difference? The case of Brazil. Musgrove P Int J Health Serv; 1990; 20(4):691-715. PubMed ID: 2125029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Is family planning effective and profitable in Rwanda?]. Tallon F Imbonezamuryango; 1990 Aug; (18):22-7. PubMed ID: 12316570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Health services and health economics]. Cilingiroglu N Nufusbil Derg; 1988; 10():45-50. PubMed ID: 12342133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative influence of political, cost/benefit, and statistical information on administrative decision making. Lorenzen GL; Braskamp LA Eval Program Plann; 1978; 1(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 10308750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. General problems in medical decision making with comments on ROC analysis. Lusted LB Semin Nucl Med; 1978 Oct; 8(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 112682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]