153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8148512)
1. Report of the task force on consent to voluntary hospitalization.
Cournos F; Faulkner LR; Fitzgerald L; Griffith E; Munetz MR; Winick B
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):293-307. PubMed ID: 8148512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. On being 'too crazy' to sign into a mental hospital: the issue of consent to psychiatric hospitalization.
Hoge SK
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):431-50. PubMed ID: 7841515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The benefits of voluntary inpatient psychiatric hospitalization: myth or reality?
Stone DH
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1999; 9(1):25-52. PubMed ID: 16506327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Capacity to consent to voluntary hospitalization: searching for a satisfactory Zinermon screen.
Poythress NG; Cascardi M; Ritterband L
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(4):439-52. PubMed ID: 9001744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Competency to consent to voluntary hospitalization: a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of Zinermon v. Burch.
Winick BJ
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1991; 14(3):169-214. PubMed ID: 1864687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Coercion and mental health treatment.
Winick BJ
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1997; 74(4):1145-68. PubMed ID: 16086505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The involuntary civil commitment of mentally ill persons in the United States and Romania: a comparative analysis.
Loue S
Rev Rom Bioet; 2003; 1(1):55-88. PubMed ID: 15011669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critique of the American Psychiatric Association's guidelines for state legislation on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Schmidt WC
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1985; 11(1):11-43. PubMed ID: 16100810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Advance directives in a correctional setting.
Thomas DL; Watson JM
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):878-99. PubMed ID: 12455557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The due process right to a safe and humane environment for patients in state custody: the voluntary/involuntary distinction.
Kellogg SC
Am J Law Med; 1997; 23(2-3):339-62. PubMed ID: 9262760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychiatric and chemical dependency treatment of minors: the myth of voluntary treatment and the capacity to consent.
Balos B; Schwartz I
Dickinson Law Rev; 1987; 92(3):631-47. PubMed ID: 16086459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent to human subject research: improving the process of obtaining informed consent from mentally ill persons.
Derrickson D
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 25(1):143-65. PubMed ID: 12173638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The health care proxy for mental illness: can it work and should we want it to?
Sales GN
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):161-79. PubMed ID: 8364235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The privatization of the civil commitment process and the state action doctrine: have the mentally ill been systematically stripped of their Fourteenth Amendment rights?
Brooks W
Duquesne Law Rev; 2001; 40(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 16518904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The rights of the mentally ill under state constitutions.
Meisel A
Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):7-40. PubMed ID: 11645495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical review panels versus court hearings in treatment refusal by involuntary patients.
Storch DD
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1992 Oct; 43(10):1033-5. PubMed ID: 1398569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mental hospitalization of troublesome youth: an analysis of skyrocketing admission rates.
Weithorn LA
Stanford Law Rev; 1988 Feb; 40(3):773-838. PubMed ID: 10286326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment.
Redding RE
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):695-753. PubMed ID: 11656328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clark v. Arizona: diminishing the right of mentally ill individuals to a full and fair defense.
Wortzel H; Metzner J
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 17185487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
