1055 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8148513)
1. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mentally ill and non-mentally ill defendants' abilities to understand information relevant to adjudication: a preliminary study.
Hoge SK; Poythress N; Bonnie R; Eisenberg M; Monahan J; Feucht-Haviar T; Oberlander L
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 8807159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: an eight-state study.
Callahan LA; Steadman HJ; McGreevy MA; Robbins PC
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 1786413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of female versus male insanity acquittees in Colorado.
Seig A; Ball E; Menninger JA
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(4):523-32. PubMed ID: 8639980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intoxication and settled insanity: a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity.
Feix J; Wolber G
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 17592162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors associated with the diversion of mentally disordered offenders.
Davis S
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 7841510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The competency of criminal defendants to refuse, for delusional reasons, a viable insanity defense recommended by counsel.
Litwack TR
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):135-56. PubMed ID: 12645042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The reliability of expert assessment: comparative study of hospitalized or imprisoned patients following criminal behavior].
Tron P; Loas G
Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1992 Dec; 150(10):741-5; discussion 745-6. PubMed ID: 1343504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prearraignment forensic evaluation: the odyssey moves east of the Pecos.
Miller RD
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 2245246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The criminal justice outcomes of jail diversion programs for persons with mental illness: a review of the evidence.
Sirotich F
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):461-72. PubMed ID: 20018995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insanity plea: predicting not guilty by reason of insanity adjudications.
Jeffrey RW; Pasewark RA; Bieber S
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3365477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Criminal recidivism in mentally ill offenders: a pilot study.
Harris V; Koepsell TD
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 8807158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The unconditional release of mentally ill offenders from indefinite commitment: a study of Missouri insanity acquittees.
Linhorst DM
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):563-79. PubMed ID: 10638784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity": Some therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(5-6):475-81. PubMed ID: 20947166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The importance of the patients deemed not guilty by reason of insanity for the psychiatric reform.
Douzenis A
Psychiatriki; 2016; 27(3):165-168. PubMed ID: 27837570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome.
Janofsky JS; Vandewalle MB; Rappeport JR
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 2758121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary: intoxication and settled insanity--unsettled matters.
Leong GB; Leisenring SE; Dean MD
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 17592163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
