These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8148524)

  • 21. Ki-67 expression in breast carcinoma: its association with grading systems, clinical parameters, and other prognostic factors--a surrogate marker?
    Trihia H; Murray S; Price K; Gelber RD; Golouh R; Goldhirsch A; Coates AS; Collins J; Castiglione-Gertsch M; Gusterson BA;
    Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(5):1321-31. PubMed ID: 12599241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Diagnostic and prognostic significance of cytological malignancy grading of prostatic carcinoma].
    Faul P
    Urologe A; 1983 May; 22(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 6683896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cytohistomorphological grading of breast carcinoma with special reference to apoptotic rates and lymph node metastasis.
    Khan N; Rana F; Afroz N; Khan MA
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 50(3):613-8. PubMed ID: 17883162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mitotic counts provide additional prognostic information in grade II mammary carcinoma.
    Lynch J; Pattekar R; Barnes DM; Hanby AM; Camplejohn RS; Ryder K; Gillett CE
    J Pathol; 2002 Mar; 196(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 11857489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. S-phase fraction determined on fine needle aspirates is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer - a multivariate study of 770 patients.
    Gazic B; Pizem J; Bracko M; Cufer T; Borstnar S; Pohar-Marinsek Z; Us-Krasovec M
    Cytopathology; 2008 Oct; 19(5):294-302. PubMed ID: 18070112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prognostic value of cytological grading of fine-needle aspirates from breast carcinomas.
    Robinson IA; McKee G; Nicholson A; D'Arcy J; Jackson PA; Cook MG; Kissin MW
    Lancet; 1994 Apr; 343(8903):947-9. PubMed ID: 7909010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Esthesioneuroblastoma and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: impact of histological grading and clinical staging on survival and prognosis.
    Miyamoto RC; Gleich LL; Biddinger PW; Gluckman JL
    Laryngoscope; 2000 Aug; 110(8):1262-5. PubMed ID: 10942123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Histologic grading of invasive lobular carcinoma: does use of a 2-tiered nuclear grading system improve interobserver variability?
    Adams AL; Chhieng DC; Bell WC; Winokur T; Hameed O
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Aug; 13(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 19608079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Typing and grading of cytological category C5 breast lesions.
    Zafar N; Jamal S; Mamoon N; Luqman M; Anwar M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Apr; 15(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 15857595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A newly proposed semi-automated method of grading invasive lobular carcinoma: a unifying concept and correlation with prognostic markers and patient survival.
    Stevens E; Kimler BF; Davis MK; Fan F; Thomas P; Wang XY; Damjanov I; Tawfik OW
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2009; 39(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 19201737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Histological grading and surface configuration of breast cancer cells. A comparative light microscopic, transmission and scanning electron microscopic study.
    Domagala W; Mietkowski J; Koss LG
    Scan Electron Microsc; 1983; (Pt 3):1269-74. PubMed ID: 6648336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlation of levels and patterns of genomic instability with histological grading of invasive breast tumors.
    Ellsworth RE; Hooke JA; Love B; Kane JL; Patney HL; Ellsworth DL; Shriver CD
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jan; 107(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 17351743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Histologic grading of breast cancer: linkage of patient outcome with level of pathologist agreement.
    Dalton LW; Pinder SE; Elston CE; Ellis IO; Page DL; Dupont WD; Blamey RW
    Mod Pathol; 2000 Jul; 13(7):730-5. PubMed ID: 10912931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computer-aided classification of breast cancer nuclei.
    Schnorrenberg F; Pattichis CS; Schizas CN; Kyriacou K; Vassiliou M
    Technol Health Care; 1996 Aug; 4(2):147-61. PubMed ID: 8885093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Role of cytological grading in the management of breast lump.
    Mehmood A; Ahmed M; Jamal S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Mar; 13(3):150-2. PubMed ID: 12689533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. HER2/neu amplification in breast cancer: stratification by tumor type and grade.
    Hoff ER; Tubbs RR; Myles JL; Procop GW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jun; 117(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 12047143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cytological grading of breast carcinoma with histological correlation.
    Milentijević MJ; Ilić R; Milentijević I
    J BUON; 2005; 10(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 17343338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. nm23 protein expression in fine-needle aspirates from breast carcinoma: inverse correlation with cytologic grading, lymph node status, and ploidy.
    Sauer T; Furu I; Beraki K; Jebsen PW; Ormerod E; Naess O
    Cancer; 1998 Apr; 84(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 9570214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnosis and grading of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas on fine needle aspiration cytology.
    Mathur S; Dawar R; Verma K
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 50(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 17474258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative evaluation of grading of breast carcinomas in fine needle aspirates by two methods.
    Das AK; Kapila K; Dinda AK; Verma K
    Indian J Med Res; 2003 Dec; 118():247-50. PubMed ID: 14870798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.