These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8148524)

  • 61. Correlative Study of Cytological Features in Grading of Invasive Breast Carcinoma.
    Sinha A; Gill SS
    J Cytol; 2018; 35(3):149-152. PubMed ID: 30089943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Cytological grading of breast carcinoma on fine needle aspirates and its relation with histological grading.
    Phukan JP; Sinha A; Deka JP
    South Asian J Cancer; 2015; 4(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 25839018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Nuclear morphometric and cytophotometric studies of breast cancer. Comparison of the cytophotometric study results with the histological grading].
    Mikuz G; Dietze O
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1982 Jul; 94(14):368-70. PubMed ID: 7147977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The cytological grading of malignant neoplasms of the breast and its correlation with the histological grading.
    Vasudev V; R R; V G
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Jun; 7(6):1035-9. PubMed ID: 23905097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Correlation between cytological and histological grading of breast cancer and its role in prognosis.
    Pal S; Gupta ML
    J Cytol; 2016; 33(4):182-186. PubMed ID: 28028331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. To Evaluate the Applicability of Parameters of Cytological Grading Systems on Aspirates of Breast Carcinoma.
    Srivastava P; Kumar B; Joshi U; Bano M
    J Cytol; 2018; 35(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 29403164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Value of cytoprognostic classification in breast carcinomas.
    Mouriquand J; Gozlan-Fior M; Villemain D; Bouchet Y; Sage JC; Mermet MA; Bolla M
    J Clin Pathol; 1986 May; 39(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 3722403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Validity of different cytological grading systems of breast carcinoma--a hospital-based study in South India.
    Rekha TS; Nandini NM; Dhar M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):3013-6. PubMed ID: 22393982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [Histological classification and prognosis of mammary cancer-histological classification devised by the Japan Mammary Cancer Society and WHO classification].
    Takashima S; Misumi T; Yoshizawa J; Aratani S; Tanada M; Takiyama W; Saeki H; Wada T; Hukuda K; Moriwaki S
    Gan No Rinsho; 1984 Feb; 30(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 6708301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Robinson's cytological grading on aspirates of breast carcinoma: Correlation with Bloom Richardson's histological grading.
    Sinha S; Sinha N; Bandyopadhyay R; Mondal SK
    J Cytol; 2009 Oct; 26(4):140-3. PubMed ID: 21938177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson histological grading system and the complementary value of Ki-67 to this system.
    Zhang R; Chen HJ; Wei B; Zhang HY; Pang ZG; Zhu H; Zhang Z; Fu J; Bu H
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Aug; 123(15):1976-82. PubMed ID: 20819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparative evaluation of six cytological grading systems in breast carcinoma.
    Saha K; Raychaudhuri G; Chattopadhyay BK; Das I
    J Cytol; 2013 Apr; 30(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 23833396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Comparative evaluation of the modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grading system on breast carcinoma aspirates and histopathology.
    Bansal C; Singh US; Misra S; Sharma KL; Tiwari V; Srivastava AN
    Cytojournal; 2012; 9():4. PubMed ID: 22363393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Comparison of prognostic factors in mammary carcinoma: grading malignancy according to Bloom and Richardson versus assay of the growth fraction using Ki67].
    Stauch G; Lellé RJ; Broermann L; Georgii A
    Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1988; 72():256-9. PubMed ID: 3218341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. FNAC of Breast Lesions with Special Reference to IAC Standardized Reporting and Comparative Study of Cytohistological Grading of Breast Carcinoma.
    Panwar H; Ingle P; Santosh T; Singh V; Bugalia A; Hussain N
    J Cytol; 2020; 37(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 31942096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Prognosis in breast cancer on the basis of histological evaluation of malignancy according to the criteria of bloom.
    Dabska M
    Pol Med J; 1968; 7(4):908-16. PubMed ID: 5727936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Correlation of Robinson's Cytological Grading with Elston and Ellis' Nottingham Modification of Bloom Richardson Score of Histopathology for Breast Carcinoma.
    Gandhi H; Maru A; Shah N; Mansuriya RK; Rathod G; Parmar P
    Maedica (Bucur); 2023 Mar; 18(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 37266482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [A histological classification of breast carcinoma and the prognostic significance of this classification].
    Eser G
    Tip Fak Mecm; 1966; 29(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 5926833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A comparative and evaluative study of two cytological grading systems in breast carcinoma with histological grading: an important prognostic factor.
    Pandey P; Dixit A; Chandra S; Kaur S
    Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2014; 2014():767215. PubMed ID: 25763344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Grading breast cancer on microarray samples: comparison with Nottingham grade, and use of boosting classification.
    Dalton L; Page DL
    Histopathology; 2012 Sep; 61(3):497-508. PubMed ID: 22651792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.