These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8149015)

  • 1. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of tumor recurrence in patients with carcinoma of the ovaries.
    Kainz C; Prayer L; Gitsch G; Stiglbauer R; Kramer J; Reinthaller A; Kölbl H
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Mar; 178(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 8149015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of a prospective study with comparison of clinical, endosonographic, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic staging of advanced gynecologic carcinoma and recurrence.
    Houvenaeghel G; Delpero JR; Rosello R; Resbeut M; Viens P; Jacquemier J; Noirclerc M; Guerinel G
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Sep; 177(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8356495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT and MR accuracy in the detection of tumor recurrence in patients treated for ovarian cancer.
    Prayer L; Kainz C; Kramer J; Stiglbauer R; Schurawitzki H; Baldt M; Schima W; Poelzleitner D; Reinthaller A; Koelbl H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):626-32. PubMed ID: 8331235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic value of PET/CT is similar to that of conventional MRI and even better for detecting small peritoneal implants in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
    Sanli Y; Turkmen C; Bakir B; Iyibozkurt C; Ozel S; Has D; Yilmaz E; Topuz S; Yavuz E; Unal SN; Mudun A
    Nucl Med Commun; 2012 May; 33(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 22357440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of CT and MRI for the diagnosis recurrent esophageal carcinoma after operation.
    Kantarci M; Polat P; Alper F; Eroglu A; Eren S; Okur A; Onbaş O
    Dis Esophagus; 2004; 17(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 15209738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of diagnostic methods in ovarian carcinoma with emphasis on CT and MRI.
    Buist MR; Golding RP; Burger CW; Vermorken JB; Kenemans P; Schutter EM; Baak JP; Heitbrink MA; Falke TH
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Feb; 52(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 8314138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of recurrent rectal neoplasms: comparison of reliability and errors of both methods].
    Golfieri R; Totaro C; Giampalma E; Lalli A; Sbrozzi F; Soro A; Nogara G; Gavelli G
    Radiol Med; 1996 May; 91(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 8693127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses.
    Huber S; Medl M; Baumann L; Czembirek H
    Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2501-7. PubMed ID: 12174952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ovarian cancer.
    Mironov S; Akin O; Pandit-Taskar N; Hann LE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Jan; 45(1):149-66. PubMed ID: 17157627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abdominal recurrence of ovarian cancer: value of abdominal MR in patients with positive CA125 and negative CT.
    Balestreri L; Bison L; Sorio R; Morra A; Campagnutta E; Morassut S
    Radiol Med; 2002; 104(5-6):426-36. PubMed ID: 12589264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer].
    Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Computerized tomography versus lymphography in the assessment of lymph node metastasis in epithelial carcinoma of the ovary].
    La Fianza A; Dore R; Campani R; Babilonti L; Tateo S
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):684-90. PubMed ID: 2057597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The accuracy of CT and tumor markers in the detection of a recurrent ovarian carcinoma].
    Wakabayashi Y; Ishida J; Kotake F; Hirose M; Kawana K; Abe K; Amino S; Negishi Y; Akiya K
    Gan No Rinsho; 1989 Sep; 35(10):1127-31. PubMed ID: 2550684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation on non invasive diagnostic tests for the second look in epithelial ovarian cancer].
    García Enguídanos A; Crespo Azanza E; Díaz Recaséns J; Lobo Samper F; Jorge Herrero JA; Sáinz de la Cuesta Abbad R
    Rev Clin Esp; 1998 Aug; 198(8):502-5. PubMed ID: 9774878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening for distant metastases before salvage surgery in patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective case series comparing thoraco-abdominal CT, positron emission tomography and abdominal ultrasound.
    Fakhry N; Michel J; Colavolpe C; Varoquaux A; Dessi P; Giovanni A
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 37(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 22520870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of CT in the evaluation of ovarian malignancy.
    Amendola MA
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1985; 24(4):329-68. PubMed ID: 3896652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A treatment selection protocol for recurrent ovarian cancer patients: the role of FDG-PET/CT and staging laparoscopy.
    Fagotti A; Fanfani F; Rossitto C; Lorusso D; De Gaetano AM; Giordano A; Vizzielli G; Scambia G
    Oncology; 2008; 75(3-4):152-8. PubMed ID: 18827492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The diagnosis of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of ovarian carcinoma].
    Mizuno K
    Rinsho Byori; 1992 Feb; 40(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 1583787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical value of 18F-FDG PET-CT in detecting primary tumor for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary.
    Han A; Xue J; Hu M; Zheng J; Wang X
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22504050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treated ovarian cancer: MR imaging, laparotomy reassessment, and serum CA-125 values compared with clinical outcome at 1 year.
    Low RN; Duggan B; Barone RM; Saleh F; Song SY
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):918-26. PubMed ID: 15914479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.