105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8149015)
1. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of tumor recurrence in patients with carcinoma of the ovaries.
Kainz C; Prayer L; Gitsch G; Stiglbauer R; Kramer J; Reinthaller A; Kölbl H
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Mar; 178(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 8149015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of a prospective study with comparison of clinical, endosonographic, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic staging of advanced gynecologic carcinoma and recurrence.
Houvenaeghel G; Delpero JR; Rosello R; Resbeut M; Viens P; Jacquemier J; Noirclerc M; Guerinel G
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Sep; 177(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8356495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT and MR accuracy in the detection of tumor recurrence in patients treated for ovarian cancer.
Prayer L; Kainz C; Kramer J; Stiglbauer R; Schurawitzki H; Baldt M; Schima W; Poelzleitner D; Reinthaller A; Koelbl H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):626-32. PubMed ID: 8331235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of PET/CT is similar to that of conventional MRI and even better for detecting small peritoneal implants in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
Sanli Y; Turkmen C; Bakir B; Iyibozkurt C; Ozel S; Has D; Yilmaz E; Topuz S; Yavuz E; Unal SN; Mudun A
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 May; 33(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 22357440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of CT and MRI for the diagnosis recurrent esophageal carcinoma after operation.
Kantarci M; Polat P; Alper F; Eroglu A; Eren S; Okur A; Onbaş O
Dis Esophagus; 2004; 17(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 15209738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of diagnostic methods in ovarian carcinoma with emphasis on CT and MRI.
Buist MR; Golding RP; Burger CW; Vermorken JB; Kenemans P; Schutter EM; Baak JP; Heitbrink MA; Falke TH
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Feb; 52(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 8314138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of recurrent rectal neoplasms: comparison of reliability and errors of both methods].
Golfieri R; Totaro C; Giampalma E; Lalli A; Sbrozzi F; Soro A; Nogara G; Gavelli G
Radiol Med; 1996 May; 91(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 8693127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses.
Huber S; Medl M; Baumann L; Czembirek H
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2501-7. PubMed ID: 12174952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ovarian cancer.
Mironov S; Akin O; Pandit-Taskar N; Hann LE
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Jan; 45(1):149-66. PubMed ID: 17157627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abdominal recurrence of ovarian cancer: value of abdominal MR in patients with positive CA125 and negative CT.
Balestreri L; Bison L; Sorio R; Morra A; Campagnutta E; Morassut S
Radiol Med; 2002; 104(5-6):426-36. PubMed ID: 12589264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer].
Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Computerized tomography versus lymphography in the assessment of lymph node metastasis in epithelial carcinoma of the ovary].
La Fianza A; Dore R; Campani R; Babilonti L; Tateo S
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):684-90. PubMed ID: 2057597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The accuracy of CT and tumor markers in the detection of a recurrent ovarian carcinoma].
Wakabayashi Y; Ishida J; Kotake F; Hirose M; Kawana K; Abe K; Amino S; Negishi Y; Akiya K
Gan No Rinsho; 1989 Sep; 35(10):1127-31. PubMed ID: 2550684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation on non invasive diagnostic tests for the second look in epithelial ovarian cancer].
García Enguídanos A; Crespo Azanza E; Díaz Recaséns J; Lobo Samper F; Jorge Herrero JA; Sáinz de la Cuesta Abbad R
Rev Clin Esp; 1998 Aug; 198(8):502-5. PubMed ID: 9774878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for distant metastases before salvage surgery in patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective case series comparing thoraco-abdominal CT, positron emission tomography and abdominal ultrasound.
Fakhry N; Michel J; Colavolpe C; Varoquaux A; Dessi P; Giovanni A
Clin Otolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 37(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 22520870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of CT in the evaluation of ovarian malignancy.
Amendola MA
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1985; 24(4):329-68. PubMed ID: 3896652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A treatment selection protocol for recurrent ovarian cancer patients: the role of FDG-PET/CT and staging laparoscopy.
Fagotti A; Fanfani F; Rossitto C; Lorusso D; De Gaetano AM; Giordano A; Vizzielli G; Scambia G
Oncology; 2008; 75(3-4):152-8. PubMed ID: 18827492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The diagnosis of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of ovarian carcinoma].
Mizuno K
Rinsho Byori; 1992 Feb; 40(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 1583787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical value of 18F-FDG PET-CT in detecting primary tumor for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary.
Han A; Xue J; Hu M; Zheng J; Wang X
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22504050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treated ovarian cancer: MR imaging, laparotomy reassessment, and serum CA-125 values compared with clinical outcome at 1 year.
Low RN; Duggan B; Barone RM; Saleh F; Song SY
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):918-26. PubMed ID: 15914479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
