These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8149267)

  • 1. Radiation dose associated with spiral computed tomography.
    McGhee PL; Humphreys S
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1994 Apr; 45(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 8149267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
    Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation exposure in spiral computed tomography. Dose distribution and dose reduction.
    Hidajat N; Mäurer J; Schröder RJ; Wolf M; Vogl T; Felix R
    Invest Radiol; 1999 Jan; 34(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9888054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The evaluation of the physical characteristics of a volumetric computer tomograph].
    Crespi A; Leoni S; Montanari G; Paruccini N; Pedroli G; Grimaldi M; Salvini E
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 8643860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Total effective radiation dose from spiral CT and conventional radiography of the pelvis with regard to fracture classification.
    Jurik AG; Jensen LC; Hansen J
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Sep; 37(5):651-4. PubMed ID: 8915269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chau AC; Fung K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Radiation exposure in single slice and multi-slice spiral CT (a phantom study)].
    Giacomuzzi SM; Torbica P; Rieger M; Lottersberger C; Peer S; Peer R; Perkmann R; Buchberger W; Bale R; Mallouhi A; Jaschke W
    Rofo; 2001 Jul; 173(7):643-9. PubMed ID: 11512238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Radiation exposure in diagnostic CT: comparison between spiral CT and standard CT].
    Pitton MB; Harsini M; Mohr W; Schweden F; Düber C
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Sep; 5(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 7495889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of dose and risk to the body following conventional and spiral computed tomography.
    Chang LL; Chen FD; Chang PS; Liu CC; Lien HL
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1995 Apr; 55(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 7796354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Radiation-exposure studies of CT diagnosis with the standard and spiral technics].
    Langkowski JH; Pogoda P; Hess A
    Rofo; 1994 Jul; 161(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 8043761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey of conventional and spiral ct doses.
    Hidajat N; Wolf M; Nunnemann A; Liersch P; Gebauer B; Teichgräber U; Schröder RJ; Felix R
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 11161152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effective dose in X-ray examinations: comparison between spiral CT and urography in the study of renal colic].
    De Denaro M; Bregant P; Cupardo F; De Guarrini F; Rimondini A; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 102(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 11740454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Estimation of effective dose from CT examination].
    Nishizawa K; Maruyama T; Takayama M; Iwai K; Furuya Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Sep; 55(11):763-8. PubMed ID: 8532509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analyses and applications of single scan dose profiles in computed tomography.
    Tsai HY; Tung CJ; Huang MH; Wan YL
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1982-9. PubMed ID: 12945964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic measurements of whole-body imaging dose distributions in image-guided radiation therapy.
    Halg RA; Besserer J; Schneider U
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7650-61. PubMed ID: 23231313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Dosimetry comparison of pelvimetry methods using conventional radiographs and CT].
    Resten A; Mausoléo F; Suissa M; Valéro M; Taylor S; Musset D
    J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 82(9 Pt 1):991-6. PubMed ID: 11591927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Dose distribution in conventional CT and spiral CT and on the topic of dose reduction with spiral CT].
    Hidajat N; Schröder RJ; Vogl T; Mäurer J; Steger W; Felix R
    Radiologe; 1998 May; 38(5):438-43. PubMed ID: 9646354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Dosimetry in conventional and spiral CT in 8 spiral CT scanners of the latest generation].
    Scheck RJ; Coppenrath EM; Kellner MW; Lehmann KJ; Mayer M; Rock C; Rieger J; Rothmeier L; Schweden F; Sokiranski R; Bäuml A; Hahn K
    Rofo; 1998 Jun; 168(6):562-6. PubMed ID: 9687947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient doses from standard and spiral CT of the head using a fast twin-beam system.
    Seifert H; Hagen T; Bartylla K; Blass G; Piepgras U
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1139-45. PubMed ID: 9536905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.