These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8149568)

  • 21. Peripheral visual acuity with monovision and other contact lens corrections for presbyopia.
    Collins MJ; Brown B; Verney SJ; Makras M; Bowman KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 66(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 2771322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Subjective and objective assessment of soft bifocal contact lens performance.
    Bullimore MA; Jacobs RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):469-75. PubMed ID: 8336908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical assessment of Holo-Or trifocal diffractive contact lens.
    Fulga V; Schroder S; Avraham G; Belkin M
    CLAO J; 1996 Oct; 22(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 8906381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prospective clinical evaluation of the Acuvue Bifocal contact lens.
    Key JE; Yee JL
    CLAO J; 1999 Oct; 25(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 10555737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical experience with the SimulVue soft bifocal contact lens.
    Bierly JR; Furgason TG; Litteral G; VanMeter WS
    CLAO J; 1995 Apr; 21(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 7796528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of age, decentration, aberrations and pupil size on subjective image quality with concentric bifocal optics.
    Rio D; Woog K; Legras R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):411-20. PubMed ID: 27196105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A quantitative and qualitative assessment of the Solitaire Bifocal Contact Lens.
    Bierly JR; Lim ES; Litteral G; Anderson CW
    CLAO J; 1995 Jan; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 7712600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical evaluation of fitting presbyopic patients with contact lenses.
    Kuhl SA; Henry VA; Bennett ES
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Mar; 63(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 1583278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers.
    Bachman WG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the ZEBRA 2000 (Z-10) Breger Vision bifocal contact lens.
    Smith VM; Koffler BH; Litteral G
    CLAO J; 2000 Oct; 26(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 11071346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stereopsis in presbyopes wearing monovision and simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses.
    McGill E; Erickson P
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Aug; 65(8):619-26. PubMed ID: 3177586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting and assessing visual performance with multizone bifocal contact lenses.
    Martin JA; Roorda A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 80(12):812-9. PubMed ID: 14688544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical experience with the Tangent Streak RGP bifocal contact lens.
    Josephson JE; Wong M; Caffery BE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Mar; 60(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 2708764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.
    Guillon M; Maissa C; Cooper P; Girard-Claudon K; Poling TR
    CLAO J; 2002 Apr; 28(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12054378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A prospective randomized clinical evaluation of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.
    Pepose JS; Qazi MA; Chu R; Stahl J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 158(3):436-46.e1. PubMed ID: 24932989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Good subjective presbyopic correction with newly designed aspheric multifocal contact lens.
    Zandvoort SW; Kok JH; Molenaar H
    Int Ophthalmol; 1993-1994; 17(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 8063472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Twelve-month success rates with a hydrogel diffractive bifocal contact lens.
    Back A; Grant T; Hine N; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Dec; 69(12):941-7. PubMed ID: 1300517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Artificial pupil versus contralateral balanced contact lens fit for presbyopia correction.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014 Apr; 77(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 25076468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An evaluation of four multifocal contact lenses in young monocular aphakic patients.
    Conklin JD; Litteral G; Schmeisser ET; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Apr; 18(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 1606680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.