These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8149568)

  • 41. Clinical Efficacy of Pinhole Soft Contact Lenses for the Correction of Presbyopia.
    Park SY; Choi YJ; Jung JW; Choi M; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2019; 34(2):106-114. PubMed ID: 30865475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical assessment of the piggyback bifocal contact lens system.
    Vredevoogd LJ; Litteral G; Bierly JR; Cordahi G
    CLAO J; 1999 Jan; 25(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 10073635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Characteristic of binocular vision found for presbyopic patients wearing single vision contact lenses.
    Lebow KA; Goldberg JB
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1975 Nov; 46(11):1116-23. PubMed ID: 802938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparative visual performance of three presbyopic contact lens corrections.
    Back A; Grant T; Hine N
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Jun; 69(6):474-80. PubMed ID: 1641231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Combining zonal refractive and diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Javaloy J; Sakla HF; Cerviño A
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 22373031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Simulated in situ optical performance of bifocal contact lenses.
    Chateau N; Baude D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jul; 74(7):532-9. PubMed ID: 9293522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia].
    Avetisov SE; Rybakova EG; Egorova GB; Churkina MN; Borodina NV; Boev VI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2003; 119(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 12934502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Power profiles in multifocal contact lenses with variable multifocal zone.
    Monsálvez-Romín D; Domínguez-Vicent A; García-Lázaro S; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Cerviño A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Jan; 101(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 28718954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Multifocal intraocular lenses--an assessment of current status].
    Hessemer V; Eisenmann D; Jacobi KW
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Jul; 203(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 8411889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Traditional methods for the treatment of presbyopia: spectacles, contact lenses, bifocal contact lenses.
    Callina T; Reynolds TP
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 19(1):25-33, v. PubMed ID: 16500526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Optical power distribution of refractive and aspheric multifocal contact lenses: Effect of pupil size.
    Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 25899637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Patient response to concentric bifocal contact lenses.
    Harris MG; Sheedy JE; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 1813535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Adaptation to multifocal and monovision contact lens correction.
    Fernandes PR; Neves HI; Lopes-Ferreira DP; Jorge JM; González-Meijome JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 23376896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visual performance of single vision and multifocal contact lenses in non-presbyopic myopic eyes.
    Fedtke C; Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K; Chung J; Thomas V; Holden BA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Feb; 39(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26228543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25230076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Does the presbyopic visual system adapt to contact lenses?
    Sheedy JE; Harris MG; Gan CM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):482-6. PubMed ID: 8336910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A quantitative and qualitative assessment of the NOVAWET-Perception bifocal contact lens.
    Anderson CW; Bierly JR; Litteral G; Gross J; Hainsworth D
    CLAO J; 1996 Apr; 22(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 8728616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Efficacy of a new refractive multifocal contact lens for presbyopia.
    Kim DY; Ahn H; Lee S; Jun I; Seo KY; Kim SY; Kim TI
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8878. PubMed ID: 38632261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A clinical evaluation of two multifocal soft contact lenses.
    Gussler CH; Solomon KD; Gussler JR; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Oct; 18(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 1424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.