These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8149568)

  • 61. Correction of presbyopia with contact lenses: comparative success rates with three systems.
    Back AP; Holden BA; Hine NA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Aug; 66(8):518-25. PubMed ID: 2771342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Comparison of visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes with multifocal intraocular lens versus fellow eyes with clear lens].
    Li JH; Zhao YE; Huang F; Zhao YY; Zheng JW
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 46(8):691-6. PubMed ID: 21054992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Simulation of commercial vs theoretically optimised contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Legras R; Rio D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 28439978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The influence of large-diameter multifocal contact lens on ocular surface, visual quality, and visual function for presbyopic adults with dry eye syndromes.
    Hsiao CJ; Tung HC; Tien CL; Chang YW; Cheng CY
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):19444. PubMed ID: 37945680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Visual acuity from far to near and contrast sensitivity in eyes with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with a low addition power.
    Hayashi K; Manabe S; Hayashi H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Dec; 35(12):2070-6. PubMed ID: 19969210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effect of an aspheric intraocular lens on the ocular wave-front adjusted for pupil size and capsulorhexis size.
    Crnej A; Buehl W; Greslechner R; Hirnschall N; Findl O
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 92(5):e353-7. PubMed ID: 24479668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Comparative analysis of the visual and refractive outcomes of an aspheric diffractive intraocular lens with and without toricity.
    Frieling-Reuss EH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1485-93. PubMed ID: 24075157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Effect of Contact Lens Design on Objective Visual Acuity-Based Parameters in Pre-Presbyopic Patients in Photopic and Mesopic Lighting Conditions.
    Sztrigler-Cohen O; Bromberger N; Thee Y; Lender R; Ben-Eli H
    Vision (Basel); 2023 Jun; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 37368819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Contact lens wear after photorefractive keratectomy: comparison between rigid gas permeable and soft contact lenses.
    Lim L; Siow KL; Chong JS; Tan DT
    CLAO J; 1999 Oct; 25(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 10555738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Investigation of the Alges bifocal.
    Josephson JE; Caffery BE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Mar; 60(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 2708765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Vision and task performance with monovision and diffractive bifocal contact lenses.
    Harris MG; Sheedy JE; Gan CM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Aug; 69(8):609-14. PubMed ID: 1513556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses.
    Efron S; Efron N; Morgan PB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 18317336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction.
    Gupta N; Wolffsohn JS; Naroo SA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1401-9. PubMed ID: 19631128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL.
    Mojzis P; Kukuckova L; Majerova K; Liehneova K; Piñero DP
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Oct; 30(10):666-72. PubMed ID: 25291749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Accommodative functions with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Montés-Micó R; Madrid-Costa D; Radhakrishnan H; Charman WN; Ferrer-Blasco T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):998-1004. PubMed ID: 21552179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Optical quality of rotationally symmetrical contact lenses derived from their power profiles.
    Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Monsálvez-Romín D; Papadatou E
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):346-350. PubMed ID: 28522252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Varifocal contact lenses for the correction of presbyopia.
    Port M; Refson K; Minards J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Sep; 15(5):457-61. PubMed ID: 8524574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Through-focus performance with multifocal contact lenses: effect of binocularity, pupil diameter and inherent ocular aberrations.
    Plainis S; Ntzilepis G; Atchison DA; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23199097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Stereoacuity with balanced presbyopic contact lenses.
    Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Jan; 94(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 21039847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Comparison of two different surgical treatments of presbyopia for hyperopic patients over 55 years old: Presbylasik (Supracor) and Prelex (presbyopic lens exchange)].
    Moyal L; Abrieu-Lacaille M; Bonnel S; Sendon D; de Rivoyre B; Berguiga M; Rambaud C; Froussart-Maille F; Rigal-Sastourné JC
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Apr; 38(4):306-15. PubMed ID: 25842151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.