These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8150515)

  • 1. Comparison of surface characteristics of six commercially pure titanium abutments.
    Quirynen M; Bollen CM; Willems G; van Steenberghe D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1994; 9(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 8150515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations.
    Quirynen M; Bollen CM; Papaioannou W; Van Eldere J; van Steenberghe D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 8666447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atomic force microscopic study of commercially available implant abutments.
    Sawase T; Wennerberg A; Hallgren C; Miyamoto I; Albrektsson T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 1999; 1(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 11359303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of surface characteristics of titanium and cobalt chromium implant abutment materials.
    Herbst D; Dullabh H; Sykes L; Vorster C
    SADJ; 2013 Sep; 68(8):350, 352-6. PubMed ID: 24660402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments.
    Rapley JW; Swan RH; Hallmon WW; Mills MP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2202669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque microbiology. An in vivo study on implants.
    Quirynen M; Van der Mei HC; Bollen CM; Van den Bossche LH; Doornbusch GI; van Steenberghe D; Busscher HJ
    J Periodontol; 1994 Feb; 65(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 8158513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
    Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.
    Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: a prospective 5-year multicenter study.
    Andersson B; Glauser R; Maglione M; Taylor A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 14714845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of cobalt-chromium alloy surface casting on resistance to deflection fatigue and surface hardness of titanium.
    Vallittu PK; Luotio K
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 9171490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemical and topographical surface analysis of five different implant abutments.
    Sawase T; Wennerberg A; Hallgren C; Albrektsson T; Baba K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Feb; 11(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 11168193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of the coupling of titanium implants and dissimilar metal abutments on osteoblast differentiation in vitro.
    Taylor JC; Anderson GI; Sutow EJ; Driscoll CF; Mackey DC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):785-97. PubMed ID: 10612915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium.
    Reddy ES; Patil NP; Guttal SS; Jagadish HG
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 17451480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supra- and subgingival biofilm formation on implant abutments with different surface characteristics.
    Elter C; Heuer W; Demling A; Hannig M; Heidenblut T; Bach FW; Stiesch-Scholz M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 18548931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque.
    Elias CN; Oshida Y; Lima JH; Muller CA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jul; 1(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 19627788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The influence of surface roughness on bacteria adhesion on titanium].
    Li M; Yang S; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Nov; 36(6):431-3. PubMed ID: 11930717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.