These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8151283)

  • 1. Statistical interpretation of DNA evidence.
    Gettinby G; Peterson M; Watson N
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1993; 33(4):212-7. PubMed ID: 8151283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lies, damned lies, and DNA statistics: DNA match testing Bayes' Theorem, and the criminal courts.
    Jowett C
    Med Sci Law; 2001 Jul; 41(3):194-205. PubMed ID: 11506343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The prosecutor's fallacy--a pitfall in interpreting probabilities in forensic evidence.
    Leung WC
    Med Sci Law; 2002 Jan; 42(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 11848139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of relatedness on likelihood ratios and the use of conservative estimates.
    Brookfield JF
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):13-9. PubMed ID: 7607450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Likelihood-based inference for genetic correlation coefficients.
    Balding DJ
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 May; 63(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 12689793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles.
    Aitken C; Taroni F; Garbolino P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 May; 63(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 12689790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation and statistical evaluation of multilocus DNA fingerprints in paternity and relationship testing.
    Rysiecki G; Brookfield JF
    Methods Mol Biol; 1998; 98():97-103. PubMed ID: 9664558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DNA statistics in the Simpson matter.
    Weir BS
    Nat Genet; 1995 Dec; 11(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 7493014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative approaches to population structure.
    Morton NE
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):139-44. PubMed ID: 7607451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applications of the Dirichlet distribution to forensic match probabilities.
    Lange K
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):107-17. PubMed ID: 7607447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence.
    Thompson WC; Taroni F; Aitken CG
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 12570198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.
    Curran JM; Gill P; Bill MR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15607589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Commentary on: Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003;48(1):47-54.
    Brenner CH; Inman K
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):192-3; author reply 194-5. PubMed ID: 14979377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commentary on: Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003;48(1):47-54.
    Cotton RW; Word CJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1200; author reply 1202. PubMed ID: 14535702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The decision theory of paternity disputes: optimization considerations applied to multilocus DNA fingerprinting.
    Krawczak M; Schmidtke J
    J Forensic Sci; 1992 Nov; 37(6):1525-33. PubMed ID: 1453166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DNA evidence: wrong answers or wrong questions?
    Robertson B; Vignaux GA
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):145-52. PubMed ID: 7607452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary on: Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003 Jan.;48(1):47-54.
    Clarke GW
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1201; author reply 1202. PubMed ID: 14535703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1999; 39(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 10795411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The formal analysis of multilocus DNA fingerprints.
    Krawczak M; Bockel B
    EXS; 1993; 67():249-55. PubMed ID: 8400694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. As confusion leads to retrial in UK.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1994 Jan; 367(6459):101-2. PubMed ID: 8114895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.