These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8151500)

  • 1. Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self.
    John OP; Robins RW
    J Pers; 1993 Dec; 61(4):521-51. PubMed ID: 8151500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetry in judgments of personality: others are less differentiated than the self.
    Beer A; Watson D
    J Pers; 2008 Jun; 76(3):535-60. PubMed ID: 18399954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences between traits: properties associated with interjudge agreement.
    Funder DC; Dobroth KM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1987 Feb; 52(2):409-18. PubMed ID: 3559898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of personality traits in self-rated oral health and preferences for different types of flawed smiles.
    Montero J; Gómez Polo C; Rosel E; Barrios R; Albaladejo A; López-Valverde A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Jan; 43(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 26333128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreeableness: dimension of personality or social desirability artifact?
    Graziano WG; Tobin RM
    J Pers; 2002 Oct; 70(5):695-727. PubMed ID: 12322857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do people know how they behave? Self-reported act frequencies compared with on-line codings by observers.
    Gosling SD; John OP; Craik KH; Robins RW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 May; 74(5):1337-49. PubMed ID: 9599447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personality judgment at zero acquaintance: agreement, assumed similarity, and implicit simplicity.
    Beer A; Watson D
    J Pers Assess; 2008 May; 90(3):250-60. PubMed ID: 18444121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do children use the big five, too? Content and structural form in personality description.
    Donahue EM
    J Pers; 1994 Mar; 62(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 8169758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construal processes and trait ambiguity: implications for self-peer agreement in personality judgment.
    Hayes AF; Dunning D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1997 Mar; 72(3):664-77. PubMed ID: 9120790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-other agreement of personality judgments in job interviews: exploring the effects of trait, gender, age and social desirability.
    Nederström M; Salmela-Aro K
    Scand J Psychol; 2014 Oct; 55(5):520-6. PubMed ID: 25065765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Separating method factors and higher order traits of the Big Five: a meta-analytic multitrait-multimethod approach.
    Chang L; Connelly BS; Geeza AA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Feb; 102(2):408-26. PubMed ID: 21967007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personality Stability from Childhood to Midlife: Relating Teachers' Assessments in Elementary School to Observer- and Self-Ratings 40 Years Later.
    Edmonds GW; Goldberg LR; Hampson SE; Barckley M
    J Res Pers; 2013 Oct; 47(5):505-513. PubMed ID: 24039315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Less Evaluative Measures of Personality in Job Applicant Contexts: The Effect on Socially Desirable Responding and Criterion Validity.
    Wood JK; Anglim J; Horwood S
    J Pers Assess; 2024; 106(3):372-383. PubMed ID: 37703381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five.
    McCrae RR; Yamagata S; Jang KL; Riemann R; Ando J; Ono Y; Angleitner A; Spinath FM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):442-55. PubMed ID: 18665712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Target adjustment and self-other agreement: utilizing trait observability to disentangle judgeability and self-knowledge.
    Human LJ; Biesanz JC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Jul; 101(1):202-16. PubMed ID: 21604892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving assessment of personality disorder traits through social network analysis.
    Clifton A; Turkheimer E; Oltmanns TF
    J Pers; 2007 Oct; 75(5):1007-31. PubMed ID: 17760855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer assessment of personality traits and pathology in female college students.
    Oltmanns TF; Turkheimer E; Strauss ME
    Assessment; 1998 Mar; 5(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 9458342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient-informant agreement on personality ratings and self-awareness after head injury.
    Kurtz JE; Putnam SH
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Sep; 20(3):453-68. PubMed ID: 16895858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: the role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity.
    Watson D; Hubbard B; Wiese D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Mar; 78(3):546-58. PubMed ID: 10743880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personality judgment and personality pathology: self-other agreement in adolescents with conduct disorder.
    Furr RM; Dougherty DM; Marsh DM; Mathias CW
    J Pers; 2007 Jun; 75(3):629-62. PubMed ID: 17489894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.