These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8152983)

  • 21. Evaluation of a community fissure sealant programme in County Meath, Ireland.
    Parnell CA; O'Farrell M; Howell F; Hegarty M
    Community Dent Health; 2003 Sep; 20(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 12940304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Garcia L; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer/resin-based hybrid materials used as pit and fissure sealants.
    de Luca-Fraga LR; Pimenta LA
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Jun; 32(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 11491626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative study of two fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical follow-up.
    Yildiz E; Dörter C; Efes B; Koray F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):979-84. PubMed ID: 15387838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A 2-year clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of a bonding agent.
    Boksman L; McConnell RJ; Carson B; McCutcheon-Jones EF
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 8511264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The retention of fissure sealants using twenty-second etching time: three-year follow-up.
    Eidelman E; Shapira J; Houpt M
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 3280632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fissure sealing with a light-cured resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement (Vitrebond) compared with a resin sealant.
    Raadal M; Utkilen AB; Nilsen OL
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1996 Dec; 6(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 9161190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin used as a fissure sealant: 48-month results.
    Pereira AC; Pardi V; Mialhe FL; Meneghim MC; Basting RT; Werner CW
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):294-6. PubMed ID: 11764120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
    Qin M; Liu H
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effectiveness of primer and bond in sealant retention and caries prevention.
    Mascarenhas AK; Nazar H; Al-Mutawaa S; Soparkar P
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 18402095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Compomer as a pit and fissure sealant: effectiveness and retention after 24 months.
    Puppin-Rontani RM; Baglioni-Gouvea ME; deGoes MF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16734311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can Glass ionomer sealants be cost-effective?
    Kervanto-Seppälä S; Lavonius E; Kerosuo E; Pietilä I
    J Clin Dent; 2000; 11(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11460286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 2-year clinical performance of a fluoride-containing fissure sealant in young schoolchildren at caries risk.
    Carlsson A; Petersson M; Twetman S
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 9545884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of retention rates of fissure sealants using two flowable restorative materials and a conventional resin sealant: two-year follow-up.
    Oba AA; Sönmez IŞ; Ercan E; Dülgergil T
    Med Princ Pract; 2012; 21(3):234-7. PubMed ID: 22156663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical performance of sealants with and without a bonding agent.
    Pinar A; Sepet E; Aren G; Bölükbaşi N; Ulukapi H; Turan N
    Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 15892532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro evaluation of sealing pits and fissures with newer glass-ionomer cements developed for the ART technique.
    Smales RJ; Gao W; Ho FT
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 9484119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of two resin based fissure sealants: a comparative clinical study.
    Bhatia MR; Patel AR; Shirol DD
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 23263426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of fissure sealant retention as an outcome measure in a dental school setting.
    Mascarenhas AK; Moursi AM
    J Dent Educ; 2001 Sep; 65(9):861-5. PubMed ID: 11569601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two-year retention and caries rates of UltraSeal XT and FluoroShield light-cured pit and fissure sealants.
    Boksman L; Carson B
    Gen Dent; 1998; 46(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 9663075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A two-year clinical trial comparing the retention of two fissure sealants.
    Raadal M; Utkilen AB; Nilsen OL
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1991 Aug; 1(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 1838281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.