These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Fracture resistance of amalgam and composite resin cores retained by various intradentinal retentive features. Tjan AH; Dunn JR; Lee JK Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 8511280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The retention of amalgam and composite resin by a smooth, reverse-tapered pin. Brackett WW; Bailey JH Oper Dent; 1992; 17(4):152-5. PubMed ID: 1287596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture resistance of four core materials with incorporated pins. Kao EC; Hart S; Johnston WM Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 2701071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond. Imbery TA; Hilton TJ; Reagan SE Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro fracture resistance of teeth with dentin-bonded ceramic crowns and core build-ups. Lang M; McHugh S; Burke FJ Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():88A-96A. PubMed ID: 14674507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations. Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation. Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations. Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of core buildup material on the fatigue strength of an all-ceramic crown. Azer SS; Drummond JL; Campbell SD; El Moneim Zaki A J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):624-31. PubMed ID: 11753315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical effects of splint types on traumatized tooth: a photoelastic stress analysis. Burcak Cengiz S; Stephan Atac A; Cehreli ZC Dent Traumatol; 2006 Jun; 22(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16643288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention and resistance provided by nine self-threading pins. Burgess JO; Summitt JB Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 1803329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compressive shear strength of core materials and restoring techniques. Sahmali SM; Saygili G Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Jun; 20(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 11203569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of Class IV resin composite restorations. Roberts HW; Hermesch CB; Charlton DG Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 11203830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture toughness of pin-retained class 4 restorations. Attin T; Hellwig E; Hilgers RD; Zimmermann U Oper Dent; 1994; 19(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9028250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials. Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]