These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8152997)

  • 1. Class 5 composite resin restorations: margin configurations and the distance from the CEJ.
    Hall LH; Cochran MA; Swartz ML
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(6):246-50. PubMed ID: 8152997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
    Hoelscher DC; Gregory WA; Linger JB; Pink FE
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H; Tahvildarnejad N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 17277834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth.
    Swanson TK; Feigal RJ; Tantbirojn D; Hodges JS
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 18481578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin.
    Owens BM; Halter TK; Brown DM
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 9728146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: effect of microhybrid, flowable, and compactable resins.
    Peris AR; Duarte S; de Andrade MF
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Feb; 34(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 12666857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of Class 5 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel and dentin bonding.
    Farid MR; Gomaa HM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1271-5. PubMed ID: 9497668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded Class 5 composite resin restorations.
    Munro GA; Hilton TJ; Hermesch CB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 9484173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation.
    Corona SA; Borsatto M; Dibb RG; Ramos RP; Brugnera A; Pécora JD
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 11551014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations.
    Bagheri M; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 18264534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of Class II silver glass ionomer/composite restorations.
    Stratmann RG; Donly KJ
    Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 1906718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures.
    Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class IV preparation design for microfilled and macrofilled composite resin.
    Donly KJ; Browning R
    Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 1502113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [In vitro study of the microleakage pattern around posterior composite resin restorations using a new dentin bonding agent].
    Tzoutzas J; Donovan T; Babou M
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1989 Dec; 43(6):505-10. PubMed ID: 2518077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.