These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8152997)

  • 21. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Canabarro S; Lopes GC; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 14531591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro.
    Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 12413221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites.
    Ozel E; Korkmaz Y; Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):65-72. PubMed ID: 18997918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study.
    Neme AM; Maxson BB; Pink FE; Aksu MN
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 12413226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques.
    Beznos C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 11203779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations.
    Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized resin composite balls, and beta-quartz inserts on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Applequist EA; Meiers JC
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Apr; 27(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 8941843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage in the proximal walls of direct and indirect posterior resin slot restorations.
    Fruits TJ; Knapp JA; Khajotia SS
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):719-27. PubMed ID: 17153983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A study of microleakage in Class II composite restorations using four different curing techniques.
    Gharizadeh N; Moradi K; Haghighizadeh MH
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 17695605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners.
    Leevailoj C; Cochran MA; Matis BA; Moore BK; Platt JA
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11357574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation.
    Delme KI; Deman PJ; De Moor RJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):676-85. PubMed ID: 16102081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum.
    Demarco FF; Ramos OL; Mota CS; Formolo E; Justino LM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11357567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of load cycling on the microleakage of beveled and nonbeveled margins in class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Ameri H; Ghavamnasiri M; Abdoli E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Oct; 11(5):025-32. PubMed ID: 20978721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of retention grooves on posterior composite resin restorations: an in vitro microleakage study.
    Shahani DR; Menezes JM
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(4):156-64. PubMed ID: 1287597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.