These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8153244)

  • 1. The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time, and stimulus intensity.
    Jaskowski P; Rybarczyk K; Jaroszyk F
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 8153244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Intensity on the Speech Evoked Auditory Late Latency Response in Normal Hearing Individuals.
    Prakash H; Abraham A; Rajashekar B; Yerraguntla K
    J Int Adv Otol; 2016 Apr; 12(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 27340986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory stimulus processing at different stimulus intensities as reflected by auditory evoked potentials.
    Adler G; Adler J
    Biol Psychiatry; 1991 Feb; 29(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 2036478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of stimulation parameters on auditory stimulus processing in schizophrenia and major depression: an auditory evoked potential study.
    Adler G; Adler J; Schneck M; Armbruster B
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1990 May; 81(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 2356768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensory and movement-related cortical potentials in nociceptive and auditory reaction time tasks.
    Tarkka IM; Treede RD; Bromm B
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1992 Oct; 86(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 1455981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modulation of motor cortical excitability with auditory stimulation.
    Löfberg O; Julkunen P; Kallioniemi E; Pääkkönen A; Karhu J
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Sep; 120(3):920-925. PubMed ID: 29742032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80- to 200-millisecond latency range.
    Adler G; Adler J
    Audiology; 1989; 28(6):316-24. PubMed ID: 2597095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of the critical band on auditory-evoked magnetic fields.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Matsuoka K
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1787-90. PubMed ID: 16237327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evoked K-complex: all-or-none phenomenon?
    Bastien C; Campbell K
    Sleep; 1992 Jun; 15(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 1621024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. OSP parameters and the cognitive component of reaction time to a missing stimulus: linking brain and behavior.
    Hernández OH; Vogel-Sprott M
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 19501943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus duration and the sensory memory trace: an event-related potential study.
    Paavilainen P; Jiang D; Lavikainen J; Näätänen R
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Apr; 35(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 8507743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus parameter effects on the P50 evoked response.
    Zouridakis G; Boutros NN
    Biol Psychiatry; 1992 Nov; 32(9):839-41. PubMed ID: 1450298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
    Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probing the time-course of the auditory oddball P3 with secondary reaction time.
    Woodward SH; Brown WS; Marsh JT; Dawson ME
    Psychophysiology; 1991 Nov; 28(6):609-18. PubMed ID: 1816588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: auditory intensity and tone frequency effects.
    Cass M; Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1997 Jun; 46(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 9255431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scalp- and sLORETA-derived loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEPs) in unmedicated depressed males and females and healthy controls.
    Jaworska N; Blier P; Fusee W; Knott V
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Sep; 123(9):1769-78. PubMed ID: 22425485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex revealed by multi-channel SQUID system.
    Yamamoto T; Uemura T; Llinás R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 1604979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials.
    Billings CJ; Tremblay KL; Souza PE; Binns MA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 17389790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mental processing during reactions toward and away from a stimulus: an ERP analysis of auditory congruence and S-R compatibility.
    Ragot R; Fiori N
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Sep; 31(5):439-46. PubMed ID: 7972598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.