These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8153332)

  • 21. Email notification combined with off site signing substantially reduces resident approval to faculty verification time.
    Deitte LA; Moser PP; Geller BS; Sistrom CL
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jun; 18(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 21371914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A picture is worth a thousand words: needs assessment for multimedia radiology reports in a large tertiary care medical center.
    Nayak L; Beaulieu CF; Rubin DL; Lipson JA
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1577-83. PubMed ID: 24200485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. X-ray report turnaround studies.
    Vogel GE; Givey J
    Radiol Manage; 1984 Jun; 6(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 10267083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
    Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Structured radiology reports].
    Sinitsyn VE; Komarova MA; Mershina EA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (6):47-52. PubMed ID: 25975133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of an in-house emergency radiologist on report turnaround time.
    Lamb L; Kashani P; Ryan J; Hebert G; Sheikh A; Thornhill R; Fasih N
    CJEM; 2015 Jan; 17(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 25781380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effect of an Electronic Peer-Review Auditing System on Faculty-Dictated Radiology Report Error Rates.
    Chung JH; MacMahon H; Montner SM; Liu L; Paushter DM; Chang PJ; Katzman GL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1215-1218. PubMed ID: 27245996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improving communication and documentation concerning preliminary and final radiology reports.
    Gorman A; Donnell L; Hepp H; Mack T
    J Healthc Qual; 2007; 29(2):13-21. PubMed ID: 17465166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Significance of using DICOM communication standard in quality assurance in radiation oncology - an institutional experience.
    Tobias P; Vrana D; Cwiertka K; Gremlica D; Slampa P
    J BUON; 2013; 18(4):1045-7. PubMed ID: 24344036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Standardizing the radiologic report -- norm DIN 6827-5].
    Hackländer T
    Rofo; 2004 Oct; 176(10):1481-4. PubMed ID: 15383982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target.
    Johnson AJ; Ying J; Swan JS; Williams LS; Applegate KE; Littenberg B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jul; 1(7):497-505. PubMed ID: 17411639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Discordance rates between preliminary and final radiology reports on cross-sectional imaging studies at a level 1 trauma center.
    Stevens KJ; Griffiths KL; Rosenberg J; Mahadevan S; Zatz LM; Leung AN
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):1217-26. PubMed ID: 18790392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Possible solution for the problem of unread image interpretation reports: the "Gunma University Star Search".
    Tsushima Y; Hirasawa H; Wakabayashi Y; Taketomi-Takahashi A; Sutou T; Tanaka K; Takizawa M; Komatsu Y
    Jpn J Radiol; 2020 Jul; 38(7):643-648. PubMed ID: 32185670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting.
    Larson DB; Towbin AJ; Pryor RM; Donnelly LF
    Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 23329657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports in a teaching hospital setting.
    Seltzer SE; Kelly P; Adams DF; Chiango BF; Viera MA; Fener E; Hooton S; Bannon-Rohrbach S; Healy CD; Doubilet PM; Holman BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):889-93. PubMed ID: 9124134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Design and implementation of a new radiology consultation service in a teaching hospital.
    Khorasani R; Silverman SG; Meyer JE; Gibson M; Weissman BN; Seltzer SE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Aug; 163(2):457-9. PubMed ID: 8037049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Process redesign: making your film library work for you.
    Mace JD
    Radiol Manage; 1995; 17(4):52-60. PubMed ID: 10152700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Academic radiology and the emergency department: does it need changing?
    Blane CE; Desmond JS; Helvie MA; Zink BJ; Bailey JE; Yang LD; Dunnick NR
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 17434076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. File management in a radiology department.
    King JL; Miller DW; Sweitzer MC; Rayborn V; Hoffart M; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1185-8. PubMed ID: 10227486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.