These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8153556)

  • 81. Hearing-aid users' voices: a factor that could affect directional benefit.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):789-94. PubMed ID: 23777478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Multichannel syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners.
    De Gennaro S; Braida LD; Durlach NI
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3958996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bustamante DK; Braida LD
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):149-60. PubMed ID: 3430374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Speech recognition and just-follow-conversation tasks for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with different maskers.
    Larsby B; Arlinger S
    Audiology; 1994; 33(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 8042937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Evaluating a smartphone digits-in-noise test as part of the audiometric test battery.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Smits C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 May; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model.
    Beutelmann R; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2479-97. PubMed ID: 20370031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Fitting range of the BAHA Intenso.
    Bosman AJ; Snik FM; Mylanus EA; Cremers WR
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):346-52. PubMed ID: 19925342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Comfortable loudness levels for speech: effects of signal-to-noise ratios and instructions.
    Beattie RC; Himes BE
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 6545540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
    Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Simpson AM; Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():101-7. PubMed ID: 2356717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice.
    Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1295-300. PubMed ID: 8408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Modelling the speech reception threshold in non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners as a function of level.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):856-65. PubMed ID: 20936997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):400-11. PubMed ID: 9921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Hansen M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Speech enhancement by filtering in the loudness domain.
    Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():207-14. PubMed ID: 2356729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Speech intelligibility enhancement by interaural magnification.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():215-23. PubMed ID: 2356730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
    Hassager HG; Wiinberg A; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. The hearing aid input: a phonemic approach to assessing the spectral distribution of speech.
    Boothroyd A; Erickson FN; Medwetsky L
    Ear Hear; 1994 Dec; 15(6):432-42. PubMed ID: 7895939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.