These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8153556)

  • 101. [Auditory localization and speech perception in noise. Preliminary study concerning 5 cases of perceptual deafness].
    Canévet G; Santon F; Scharf B
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1986; 103(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3706968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 102. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):729-41. PubMed ID: 19626512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 103. [Influence of disturbing noise on sentence intelligibility (author's transl)].
    Welzl-Müller K
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Mar; 60(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 7230993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 104. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss.
    Wolfe J; John A; Schafer E; Nyffeler M; Boretzki M; Caraway T; Hudson M
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 21599615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 105. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 3950200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 106. Measuring the threshold for speech reception by adaptive variation of the signal bandwidth. II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Noordhoek IM; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1685-96. PubMed ID: 10738821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 107. Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.
    Sabin AT; Souza PE
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):94-107. PubMed ID: 24028890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 108. Phonemic restoration in sensorineural hearing loss does not depend on baseline speech perception scores.
    Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):EL169-74. PubMed ID: 20968321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 109. Use of the California Consonant Test in evaluating hearing aids.
    Edgerton BJ; Danhauer JL; Simmons FJ
    Am J Otol; 1986 Mar; 7(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 3963153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 110. Limited resolution of spectral contrast and hearing loss for speech in noise.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1307-14. PubMed ID: 8408972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 111. Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids.
    Luts H; Eneman K; Wouters J; Schulte M; Vormann M; Buechler M; Dillier N; Houben R; Dreschler WA; Froehlich M; Puder H; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Leijon A; Lombard A; Mauler D; Spriet A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 20329849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 112. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 113. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Huss M; Vickers DA; Glasberg BR; Alcántara JI
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Aug; 34(4):205-24. PubMed ID: 10997450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 114. Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users.
    Ellis RJ; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 25470620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 115. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
    Bacon SP; Opie JM; Montoya DY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 116. Assessing the benefit of adaptive null-steering using real-world signals.
    Woods WS; Merks I; Zhang T; Fitz K; Edwards B
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):434-43. PubMed ID: 20192874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 117. The effect of compression speed on intelligibility: simulated hearing-aid processing with and without original temporal fine structure information.
    Hopkins K; King A; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1592-601. PubMed ID: 22978888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 118. Compression-dependent differences in hearing aid gain between speech and nonspeech input signals.
    Henning RW; Bentler R
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):409-22. PubMed ID: 16079635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 119. Design and evaluation of a two-channel compression hearing aid.
    Moore BC
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):181-92. PubMed ID: 3430376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 120. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids.
    Bernstein JG; Danielsson H; Hällgren M; Stenfelt S; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Trends Hear; 2016 Nov; 20():. PubMed ID: 27815546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.