These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8153556)
121. Evaluation of a wide range of amplitude-frequency responses for the hearing impaired. van Buuren RA; Festen JM; Plomp R J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 7731212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
122. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry. Han H; Lee J; Cho S; Kim J; Lee K; Choi WD Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
123. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: age effects. Lister JJ; Roberts RA; Lister FL Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):367-74. PubMed ID: 21299377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
124. The use of high-pass amplification for broad-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Harford ER; Fox J Audiology; 1978; 17(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 623551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
125. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise. Ozimek E; Kutzner D; Sek A; Wicher A Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(7):433-43. PubMed ID: 19925330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
126. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing. Eisenberg LS; Dirks DD; Bell TS J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):222-33. PubMed ID: 7731213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
127. Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region. Noordhoek IM; Houtgast T; Festen JM J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1197-212. PubMed ID: 11303933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
128. Tolerable hearing aid delays. V. Estimation of limits for open canal fittings. Stone MA; Moore BC; Meisenbacher K; Derleth RP Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):601-17. PubMed ID: 18469715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
129. The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners. Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):401-8. PubMed ID: 11831813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
130. Speech-reception Threshold in Noise for Hearing-impaired Listeners in Conditions with a Varying Amplitude-Frequency Response. Van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(sup469):202-206. PubMed ID: 31905540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
131. Effects of speech signal content and speaker gender on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal hearing. Plyler PN; Alworth LN; Rossini TP; Mapes KE Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 21309641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
132. Duration, compression, and the aided loudness discomfort level. Fortune T; Scheller T Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 10981609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
133. Effects of expansion algorithms on speech reception thresholds. Wise CL; Zakis JA J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Feb; 19(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 18669128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
134. Determination of preferred parameters for multichannel compression using individually fitted simulated hearing AIDS and paired comparisons. Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):556-68. PubMed ID: 21285878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
135. On the problem of listening while talking. Borg E; Gustafsson D; Bergkvist C; Wikström C Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2009 Dec; 34(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 19883169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
136. Preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids. Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Hellman S; Levitt H Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 8549896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
137. Aided and unaided narrow band noise thresholds in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. Garstecki DC; Bode DL J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 931761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
138. The relationship of locus of control, self-control, and acceptable noise levels for young listeners with normal hearing. Nichols AC; Gordon-Hickey S Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 22229761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
140. New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities. Besser J; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Festen JM J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):194-209. PubMed ID: 22199191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]