These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8153561)

  • 1. Directional hearing aid based on array technology.
    Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ; Verschuure J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():20-7. PubMed ID: 8153561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
    Bilsen FA; Soede W; Berkhout AJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of a directional microphone array for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):799-808. PubMed ID: 8370886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive measures of directional benefit part 2: verification of different approaches to estimating directional benefit.
    Dittberner AB; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 17204898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
    van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a directional hearing instrument based on array technology.
    Soede W; Berkhout AJ; Bilsen FA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):785-98. PubMed ID: 8370885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring real-ear signal-to-noise ratio: application to directional hearing aids.
    Bell SL; Creeke SA; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Mar; 49(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 20151932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive measures of directional benefit part 1: estimating the directivity index on a manikin.
    Dittberner AB; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):26-45. PubMed ID: 17204897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of in-the-ear microphone directionality on sound direction identification.
    Chung K; Neuman AC; Higgins M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2264-75. PubMed ID: 18397031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino.
    Kompis M; Krebs M; Häusler R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 127(8):829-35. PubMed ID: 17762993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.
    Plomp R
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.