These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8153565)

  • 1. Adaptive feedback stabilization of hearing aids.
    Engebretson AM; French-St George M; O'Connell MP
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():56-64. PubMed ID: 8153565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.
    Plomp R
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 8-channel digital filter bank for hearing aid use: preliminary results in monaural, diotic and dichotic modes.
    Lunner T; Arlinger S; Hellgren J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():75-81. PubMed ID: 8153568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Behavioral assessment of adaptive feedback equalization in a digital hearing aid.
    French-St George M; Wood DJ; Engebretson AM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 8263825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Properties of an adaptive feedback equalization algorithm.
    Engebretson AM; French-St George M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 8263831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of feedback reduction techniques in hearing aids based on physical performance measures.
    Spriet A; Moonen M; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1245-61. PubMed ID: 20815460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactive fitting of multiple algorithms implemented in the same digital hearing aid.
    Franck BA; Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jul; 46(7):388-97. PubMed ID: 17680471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal processing for hearing impairment.
    Levitt H; Bakke M; Kates J; Neuman A; Schwander T; Weiss M
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():7-19. PubMed ID: 8153567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired.
    Chabries DM; Christiansen RW; Brey RH; Robinette MS; Harris RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
    Nordrum S; Erler S; Garstecki D; Dhar S
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic aspects of auditory training with and without hearing aid.
    Ludvigsen C
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980; (Suppl 10):69-83. PubMed ID: 6934609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noise reduction in binaural hearing aids: analyzing the benefit over monaural systems.
    Srinivasan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):EL353-9. PubMed ID: 19206693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulated real-ear measurements of benefit from digital feedback suppression.
    Olsen SØ
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Feb; 47(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 18236236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of an adaptive directional system in a DSP hearing aid.
    Bentler RA; Tubbs JL; Egge JL; Flamme GA; Dittberner AB
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 15248806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.