These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8153862)

  • 1. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Apelgren KN; Blank ML; Slomski CA; Hadjis NS
    Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Demoulin L; Kesteloot K; Penninckx F
    Surg Endosc; 1996 May; 10(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 8658331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Do costs decide? Disposable or reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?].
    Lefering R; Troidl H; Ure BM
    Chirurg; 1994 Apr; 65(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 8020351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Slater M; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Nov; 91(8):670-2. PubMed ID: 19785946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children.
    Ure BM; Lefering R; Holschneider AM
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1999 Feb; 9(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 10207696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomised study.
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt CN; Encke A
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):147-50. PubMed ID: 7552133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
    Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
    Swem T; Fazzalari R
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 7552128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs.
    Hickey M; Fields M
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regional cost analysis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Pontarelli EM; Grinberg GG; Isaacs RS; Morris JP; Ajayi O; Yenumula PR
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 30488194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instrument costs.
    Eddie G; White S
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1996 Oct; 66(10):671-5. PubMed ID: 8855921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis.
    Schaer GN; Koechli OR; Haller U
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1812-5. PubMed ID: 8610767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Costs and benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: abdominal wall lifting vs. pneumoperitoneum procedure.
    Ishikawa M; Nakagawa T; Nishioka M; Ogata S; Miyauchi T; Kashiwagi Y; Uemura N; Inoue S
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(70):497-500. PubMed ID: 16995448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments.
    Voyles CR
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Sep; 78(9):38-9. PubMed ID: 10128066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experience.
    Gitelis M; Vigneswaran Y; Ujiki MB; Denham W; Talamonti M; Muldoon JP; Linn JG
    Am J Surg; 2015 Mar; 209(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 25586597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
    DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L
    Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disposable and reusable trocars.
    Watson DI
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):140-2. PubMed ID: 7552131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reusable single-port access device shortens operative time and reduces operative costs.
    Shussman N; Kedar A; Elazary R; Abu Gazala M; Rivkind AI; Mintz Y
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jun; 28(6):1902-7. PubMed ID: 24442684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.