These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8154458)

  • 21. Changes in the location of the human mandibular foramen as a function of growth and vertical facial type.
    Epars JF; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Jul; 73(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 25330162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Floating norms for individualising the ANB angle and the WITS appraisal in orthodontic cephalometric analysis based on guiding variables.
    Paddenberg E; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jan; 84(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 34255093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical application of a method to correct angle ANB for geometric effects.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Dec; 92(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 3479897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistical evaluation of possible factors affecting the sagittal position of the first permanent molar in the maxilla.
    Andria LM; Reagin KB; Leiter LP; King LB
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 15132448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle.
    Bhad WA; Nayak S; Doshi UH
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 21303811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A cephalometric appraisal of nonextraction Begg treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Meistrell ME; Cangialosi TJ; Lopez JE; Cabral-Angeles A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Oct; 90(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 3464190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dentofacial changes in adults: a longitudinal cephalometric study in 22-33 and 33-43 year olds.
    Bondevik O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Aug; 73(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 22790315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. F-H to AB plane angle (FABA) for assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Yang SD; Suhr CH
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):223-31; discussion 232. PubMed ID: 7639436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Longitudinal cephalometric changes in the maxilla, mandible and maxillary-mandibular relationship between 10 and 14 years of age.
    Aydemir S; Ceylan I; Eröz UB
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Nov; 15(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 10806935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex.
    Mermigos J; Full CA; Andreasen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 2363406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dentoalveolar compensation related to variations in sagittal jaw relationships.
    Ishikawa H; Nakamura S; Iwasaki H; Kitazawa S; Tsukada H; Sato Y
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Dec; 69(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 10593444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relapse and stability after mandibular setback surgery one year postoperatively: a retrospective study.
    Halvorsen ET; Beddari IY; Schilbred Eriksen E; Boe OE; Wisth PJ; Loes S; Moen K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1181.e1-11. PubMed ID: 24831939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Beta and ANB Angles for Evaluation of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy: A Cephalometric Study.
    Jajoo A; Agarkar SS; Sharma S; Gadhiya N; Sonawane S; Narkhede S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):739-742. PubMed ID: 29959305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern.
    Plaza SP; Reimpell A; Silva J; Montoya D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 Sep; 24(4):63-72. PubMed ID: 31508708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cephalometric assessment of the axial inclination of upper and lower incisors in relation to the third-order angle.
    Knösel M; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 May; 68(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 17522804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Growth patterns in subjects with long and short faces.
    Nanda SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Sep; 98(3):247-58. PubMed ID: 2403077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Zamora N; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 Jul; 18(4):e725-32. PubMed ID: 23722136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
    Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determination of craniofacial growth in patients with untreated Class III malocclusions and anterior crossbites using the centroid method.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 19549679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.