These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8156016)
1. Massachusetts woman wins historic malpractice award for coerced cesarean section. Brodsky A Birth Gaz; 1993; 10(1):31. PubMed ID: 8156016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A discussion of medical malpractice and cesarean section. Berkman H Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1993 Apr; (170):9-30. PubMed ID: 10125422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [What can we learn from a case of medical malpractice?]. Kato S; Kobayashi H; Makita S; Kuwabara H; Oohira M Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Aug; 106(8):494. PubMed ID: 16119115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The question of cesarean sections. Lewis RF Wis Med J; 1991 Mar; 90(3):102, 105. PubMed ID: 2058165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cesarean section on the dead and dying patient from the legal viewpoint]. Hanack EW Gynakologe; 1982 Jun; 15(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 7117914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cesarean section on the dead and dying patient from the physician's viewpoint]. Hiersche HD Gynakologe; 1982 Jun; 15(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7117913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of the legal system in the cesarean childbirth controversy. Miller J Nurs Law Ethics; 1980 Dec; 1(10):1-2, 6, 8. PubMed ID: 6905161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Error in patient education before delivery--the newest decision of the BGH]. Ulsenheimer K Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jan; 54(1):M20-2. PubMed ID: 8150243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Nurse and the law. Informed consent and self-determination. Langslow A Aust Nurses J; 1992 Aug; 22(2):29-31. PubMed ID: 1445015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Obstetrical delivery of small premature infants--are there legal guidelines?]. Ratzel R Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1995; 199(5):203-4. PubMed ID: 8528957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Parents do not have the right to refuse to resuscitate normal newborn. Stewart-Graves v. Vaughn, 162 Wn. 2d 115, 170 P. 3d 1151 (Wash. 2008). West JC J Healthc Risk Manag; 2008; 28(1):40-1. PubMed ID: 23641494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Refusal of blood transfusion for religious reasons]. Ulsenheimer K Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jun; 54(6):M83-6. PubMed ID: 8088483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Law-medicine notes. Informed consent in malpractice cases. A turn toward reality. Curran WJ N Engl J Med; 1986 Feb; 314(7):429-31. PubMed ID: 3945269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prophylactic cesarean section at term? Feldman GB; Freiman JA N Engl J Med; 1985 May; 312(19):1264-7. PubMed ID: 3990727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal aspects of consent 3: the duty of care to inform. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2001 Apr 12-25; 10(7):466-8. PubMed ID: 12070391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The continued vitality of a patient's informed consent, or, when the patient says 'no'. Barratt K; von Briesen JD WMJ; 1999; 98(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 10235066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Pitfalls in informed consent: a statistical analysis of malpractice law suits]. Echigo J Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 May; 115(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 24946529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misadventures in cosmetic dermatology. Buppert C Dermatol Nurs; 2009; 21(3):148-9. PubMed ID: 19554848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of malpractice claims on the use of caesarean section. Schifrin BS; Cohen WR Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):269-83. PubMed ID: 23206669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. European Court of Human Right. ECHR 2013/14 Case of Csoma v. Romania, 15 January 2013, no. 8759/05 (Third Section). Dute J Eur J Health Law; 2013 Sep; 20(4):423-6. PubMed ID: 23977737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]