These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 815722)
1. Cost versus effectiveness of laboratory studies. Griner PF J Tenn Med Assoc; 1976 Mar; 69(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 815722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A priori considerations when using laboratory determinations in cost-effectiveness and clinical decision analyses. Barr JT Am J Med Technol; 1981 Aug; 47(8):619-29. PubMed ID: 6792918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive value and informational value of diagnostic test results. Johnson HA Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1993; 23(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 8457143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnostic value of clinico-chemical studies. Criteria and their practical use]. Oellerich M; Haeckel R Med Welt; 1978 May; 29(21):866-72. PubMed ID: 418308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Using cost-effectiveness analysis to weigh testing decisions. Popper C MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Sep; 24(9S Suppl):29-35. PubMed ID: 10171233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How much quality control is enough? A cost-effectiveness model for clinical laboratory quality control procedures (illustrated by its application to a ligand-assay-based screening program). Rodgers RP Med Decis Making; 1987; 7(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 3112504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Frequent errors in laboratory studies]. Gabsch HC Z Med Labortech; 1975; 16(6 suppl):1-22. PubMed ID: 1226950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive value and efficiency of hematology data. Galen RS Blood Cells; 1980; 6(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 6769520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Use of statistical parameters for determining the distribution of random errors in laboratory practice]. Makarovskiĭ VV; Titova IA; Mikhaĭlov SV; Shafranskiĭ IuA; Ermakova EA Lab Delo; 1985; (1):54-6. PubMed ID: 2579279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Proceedings: Possibility of errors in the determination of normal ranges, based on biological variance]. Kreutz FH MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1975 May; 117(20):847. PubMed ID: 805995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The evaluation of test methods in clinical diagnosis. Introduction to the subject]. Buchborn E Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1977 Apr 17-21; 83():587-91. PubMed ID: 417507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Errors in pathology and laboratory medicine: consequences and prevention. Hollensead SC; Lockwood WB; Elin RJ J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 88(3):161-81. PubMed ID: 15562462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effect of drugs on the results of clinical laboratory research]. Seleznev EF Lab Delo; 1986; (11):694-701. PubMed ID: 2432350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Resolving discordant samples in clinical laboratory practice. Datta P MLO Med Lab Obs; 2004 Nov; 36(11):28-31. PubMed ID: 15566111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Great number of non-recorded cases of analytical interference. Unexpected and misinterpreted laboratory levels can result in diagnostic and therapeutic errors]. Lindstedt G; Ekman R; Forberg R; Isaksson A; Stridsberg M; Hård L; Nordin G; Nyström E Lakartidningen; 2002 May; 99(22):2492-4. PubMed ID: 12092048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reliability of clinical chemical and hematologic laboratory analysis]. Bürgi W Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1972 Mar; 102(11):367-74. PubMed ID: 5033618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Quality control in the laboratory]. Wisser H; Knoll E Med Klin; 1974 Aug; 69(31):1287-96. PubMed ID: 4610333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]