These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8157893)

  • 21. Receiver-operator characteristic curves for the ultrasonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in low-risk pregnancies.
    David C; Tagliavini G; Pilu G; Rudenholz A; Bovicelli L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Mar; 174(3):1037-42. PubMed ID: 8633633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Symphysis-fundus measurement - the predictive value of a new reference curve.
    Pay ASD; Frøen JF; Staff AC; Jacobsson B; Gjessing HK
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2017 May; 137(10):717-720. PubMed ID: 28551970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fractional thigh volume by three-dimensional ultrasonography for birth weight prediction.
    Srisantiroj N; Chanprapaph P; Komoltri C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92(12):1580-5. PubMed ID: 20043557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differences in fat and lean mass proportions in normal and growth-restricted fetuses.
    Padoan A; Rigano S; Ferrazzi E; Beaty BL; Battaglia FC; Galan HL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1459-64. PubMed ID: 15507983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction of fetal weights in twins.
    Jensen OH; Jenssen H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1995 Mar; 74(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 7900521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Longitudinal measurement of fetal thigh soft tissue parameters and its role in the prediction of birth weight.
    O'Connor C; Farah N; O'Higgins A; Segurado R; Fitzpatrick C; Turner MJ; Stuart B; Kennelly MM
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 Oct; 33(10):945-51. PubMed ID: 23716034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimated fetal weight in the detection of the small-for-menstrual-age fetus.
    Dudley NJ; Lamb MP; Hatfield JA; Copping C; Sidebottom K
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1990 Jun; 18(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 2161010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does use of a sex-specific model improve the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation?
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 21837761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of fetal biometric ratios to neonatal morphometrics.
    Hays D; Patterson RM
    J Ultrasound Med; 1987 Feb; 6(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 3560313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight: use of targeted formulas in small for gestational age fetuses.
    Robson SC; Gallivan S; Walkinshaw SA; Vaughan J; Rodeck CH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 8355934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sonographic estimates of fetal weight in the intrauterine growth retardation population.
    Guidetti DA; Divon MY; Braverman JJ; Langer O; Merkatz IR
    Am J Perinatol; 1990 Jan; 7(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 2403794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sonographic fetal weight estimation in prolonged pregnancy: comparative study of two- and three-dimensional methods.
    Lindell G; Marsál K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 19180582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prediction of birthweight by fetal ultrasound biometry.
    Nzeh DA; Rimmer S; Moore WM; Hunt L
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 65(779):987-9. PubMed ID: 1450836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Formulas for fetal weight estimation by ultrasound measurements based on neonatal specific gravities and volumes.
    Shinozuka N; Okai T; Kohzuma S; Mukubo M; Shih CT; Maeda T; Kuwabara Y; Mizuno M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 157(5):1140-5. PubMed ID: 3318464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ultrasonographic measurement of liver length in the small-for-gestational-age fetus.
    Roberts AB; Mitchell JM; McCowan LM; Barker S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Mar; 180(3 Pt 1):634-8. PubMed ID: 10076140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound imaging in the small fetus.
    Schild RL; Maringa M; Siemer J; Meurer B; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schmid M; Hothorn T; Hansmann ME
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 18663765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of three sonographic circumference measurement techniques to predict birth weight.
    Smulian JC; Ranzini AC; Ananth CV; Rosenberg JC; Vintzileos AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 93(5 Pt 1):692-6. PubMed ID: 10912969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An improved method of fetal weight estimation using ultrasound measurements of fetal abdominal circumference.
    Poll V; Kasby CB
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Dec; 86(12):922-8. PubMed ID: 526450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.
    Weiner CP; Sabbagha RE; Vaisrub N; Socol ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jun; 65(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 3889747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
    Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.