These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8158504)

  • 1. Influence of contrast enhancement and pseudocolor transformation on the diagnosis with digital subtraction images (DSI).
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Marconi M; Häsler RU; Lang NP
    J Periodontal Res; 1994 Mar; 29(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 8158504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Color conversion of alveolar bone density changes in digital subtraction images.
    Brägger U; Pasquali L
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Apr; 16(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 2654196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of logarithmic contrast enhancement on subtraction images.
    Versteeg KH; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Oct; 80(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 8521113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone changes from color-coded with subtraction radiographs.
    Shi XQ; Eklund I; Tronje G; Welander U; Stamatakis HC; Engström PE; Engström GN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10202476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image processing for enhanced observer agreement in the evaluation of periapical bone changes.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Bragger U; Patrikiou A; Stassinakis A; Lang NP
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jul; 35(7):615-22. PubMed ID: 12190901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Nielsen PM; Lang NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1923405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of small angle discrepancies on interpretations of subtraction images.
    Davis M; Allen KM; Hausmann E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Sep; 78(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 7970605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analytical methodology in quantitative digital subtraction radiography: analyses of the aluminum reference wedge.
    Allen KM; Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1317-21. PubMed ID: 8997679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions.
    Parsell DE; Gatewood RS; Watts JD; Streckfus CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 9798239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of stent versus laser- and cephalostat-aligned periapical film-positioning techniques for use in digital subtraction radiography.
    Ludlow JB; Peleaux CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8139840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Color coding of radiographic changes over time by means of image addition.
    Welander U; Eklund I; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mähler R; Wilcox CD; Mörner AC; Uddhammar A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Oct; 78(4):531-8. PubMed ID: 7800384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
    J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images.
    Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; de Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 16798922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of peri-implant bone change.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS; van den Berg HR; Bertens E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Mar; 3(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 1420723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging.
    Stassinakis A; Brägger U; Stojanovic M; Bürgin W; Lussi A; Lang NP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 9161167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.