These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8160035)

  • 1. The value of contrast arthrography in assessing loosening of symptomatic uncemented total hip components.
    Barrack RL; Tanzer M; Kattapuram SV; Harris WH
    Skeletal Radiol; 1994 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 8160035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of aspiration and contrast-enhanced arthrography in evaluating the uncemented hip arthroplasty.
    Cheung A; Lachiewicz PF; Renner JB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1305-9. PubMed ID: 9129431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast and nuclear arthrography in loosening of the uncemented hip prosthesis.
    Swan JS; Braunstein EM; Wellman HN; Capello W
    Skeletal Radiol; 1991; 20(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2000499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of subtraction arthrography in total hip arthroplasties.
    Barentsz JO; Lemmens JM; Slooff TJ
    Rofo; 1986 Apr; 144(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 3008258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nuclear arthrography: combined scintigraphic and radiographic procedure for diagnosis of total hip prosthesis loosening.
    Oyen WJ; Lemmens JA; Claessens RA; van Horn JR; Slooff TJ; Corstens FH
    J Nucl Med; 1996 Jan; 37(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 8544004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of radiographic and scintigraphic techniques to assess aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in a total hip replacement.
    Temmerman OP; Raijmakers PG; David EF; Pijpers R; Molenaar MA; Hoekstra OS; Berkhof J; Manoliu RA; Teule GJ; Heyligers IC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2456-63. PubMed ID: 15523018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosthetic hip replacements: plain films and arthrography for component loosening.
    Phillips WC; Kattapuram SV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Apr; 138(4):677-82. PubMed ID: 6978031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of contrast and subtraction arthrography in the assessment of aseptic loosening of total hip prostheses: a meta-analysis.
    Temmerman OP; Heyligers IC; Teule GJ; Hoekstra OS; Raijmakers PG
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Oct; 56(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 15893898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False-positive radionuclide arthroscintigraphy with a porous-coated total hip prosthesis.
    Oswald SG; Herzwurm PJ
    Clin Nucl Med; 1991 Nov; 16(11):815-8. PubMed ID: 1752090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic test to diagnose loose uncemented femoral total hip components.
    Berger R; Fletcher F; Donaldson T; Wasielewski R; Peterson M; Rubash H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Sep; (330):115-23. PubMed ID: 8804281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A comparative study on short-term effectiveness between cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of femoral head after renal transplantation].
    Yu L; Qi C; Yu T; Meng Q; Zhao X; Liu K; Cai Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(12):1409-13. PubMed ID: 24640354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.
    von Roth P; Abdel MP; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25695978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty: a 5- to 9-year followup study.
    Lewallen DG; Cabanela ME
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Dec; (333):126-33. PubMed ID: 8981888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The diagnostic value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide bone scan in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Ovesen O; Riegels-Nielsen P; Lindequist S; Jensen I; Munkner T; Torfing T; Marving J
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Sep; 18(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 14513446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
    Kubinec V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of plain radiography, subtraction arthrography, nuclear arthrography, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of a loose acetabular component of a total hip prosthesis: a systematic review.
    Temmerman OP; Raijmakers PG; Deville WL; Berkhof J; Hooft L; Heyligers IC
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Sep; 22(6):818-27. PubMed ID: 17826271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical problems in arthrography of the painful hip arthroplasty.
    Hankey S; McCall IW; Park WM; O'Connor BT
    Clin Radiol; 1979 Nov; 30(6):653-6. PubMed ID: 509866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
    Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arthrography of painful hips following arthroplasty: digital versus plain film subtraction.
    Walker CW; FitzRandolph RL; Collins DN; Dalrymple GV
    Skeletal Radiol; 1991; 20(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 1925670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.