These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8161249)

  • 1. An analysis of the prediction of cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Hanzal E; Kainz C; Hoffmann G; Deutinger J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1993; 253(4):161-6. PubMed ID: 8161249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cephalopelvic disproportion index. Combined fetal sonography and x-ray pelvimetry for early detection of cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Abitbol MM; Taylor UB; Castillo I; Rochelson BL
    J Reprod Med; 1991 May; 36(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 2061886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the predictive value of X-ray pelvimetry and biparietal diameter in cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Mandry J; Grandjean H; Reme JM; Pastor J; Levade C; Pontonnier G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1983 Jul; 15(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 6617936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal pelvic index to predict cephalopelvic disproportion - a retrospective clinical cohort study.
    Korhonen U; Taipale P; Heinonen S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jun; 94(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 25682690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination of ultrasound pelvimetry and fetal sonography in predicting cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Bian X; Zhuang J; Cheng X
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1997 Dec; 110(12):942-5. PubMed ID: 9772407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study.
    Liselele HB; Boulvain M; Tshibangu KC; Meuris S
    BJOG; 2000 Aug; 107(8):947-52. PubMed ID: 10955423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Prediction of cephalopelvic disproportion by ultrasonographic cephalopelic].
    Bian X; Zhuang J; Cheng X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Sep; 33(9):533-5. PubMed ID: 10806728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of maternal height, obstetrical conjugate and fetal birth-weight in the management of patients with breech presentation.
    Mahmood TA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Feb; 30(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 2189392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Methods, techniques and assessment criteria in obstetric pelvimetry].
    Spörri S; Gyr T; Schollerer A; Werlen S; Schneider H
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1994; 198(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 8023529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The diagnostic accuracy of pelvic measurements: threshold values and fetal size.
    Korhonen U; Taipale P; Heinonen S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):643-8. PubMed ID: 24816688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A safe, low-cost, easy-to-use 3D camera platform to assess risk of obstructed labor due to cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Gleason RL; Yigeremu M; Debebe T; Teklu S; Zewdeneh D; Weiler M; Frank N; Tolentino L; Attia S; Dixon JB; Kwon C; Pokutta-Paskaleva A; Gleason KA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203865. PubMed ID: 30216374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First delivery after cesarean delivery for strictly defined cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Impey L; O'Herlihy C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 92(5):799-803. PubMed ID: 9794672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postpartum X-ray pelvimetry. Its use in calculating the fetal-pelvic index and predicting fetal-pelvic disproportion.
    O'Brien K; Rode M; Macones G
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Oct; 47(10):845-8. PubMed ID: 12418069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors related to the increasing cesarean section rates for cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Silbar EL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 May; 154(5):1095-8. PubMed ID: 3706435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia.
    Spörri S; Hänggi W; Braghetti A; Vock P; Schneider H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 89(6):902-8. PubMed ID: 9170462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Is there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century?].
    Rozenberg P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 17188014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal height and age: risk factors for cephalopelvic disproportion in Zimbabwe.
    Tsu VD
    Int J Epidemiol; 1992 Oct; 21(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 1468857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of the fetal-pelvic index in nulliparous women at high risk for fetal-pelvic disproportion.
    Morgan MA; Thurnau GR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 166(3):810-4. PubMed ID: 1550146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The utilization and efficacy of pelvimetry.
    Kelly KM; Madden DA; Arcarese JS; Barnett M; Brown RF
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1975 Sep; 125(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 1200222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR imaging pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia?
    Spörri S; Thoeny HC; Raio L; Lachat R; Vock P; Schneider H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 12076922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.