103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8161890)
1. Continuing problems with patient self-determination.
White BD; Singer PA; Siegler M
Am J Med Qual; 1993; 8(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 8161890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly.
Glover JJ
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 2110203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From the Office of the General Counsel. The right to die after Cruzan.
Orentlicher D
JAMA; 1990 Nov; 264(18):2444-6. PubMed ID: 2232004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan.
Weir RF; Gostin L
JAMA; 1990 Oct; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The case of Nancy Cruzan, the Patient Self-Determination Act and advance directives in Canada.
Singer PA
Humane Med; 1991 Aug; 7(3):225-7. PubMed ID: 11652607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of the Patient Self-Determination Act for psychiatric practice.
Kapp MB
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1994 Apr; 45(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 8020921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From the Office of the General Counsel. Cruzan v Director of Missouri Department of Health: an ethical and legal perspective.
Orentlicher D
JAMA; 1989 Nov; 262(20):2928-30. PubMed ID: 2810631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comment: the Supreme Court faces the quest of withdrawal of hydration and nutrition: Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health.
Craig P
J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Dec; 22(12):375-9. PubMed ID: 10296700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond misguided paternalism: resuscitating the right to refuse medical treatment.
Malloy SE
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1998; 33():1035-91. PubMed ID: 11660805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of families as surrogate decisionmakers after Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
Rushton CH; Hogue EE
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():219-38. PubMed ID: 10111247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. After the Cruzan case: the primary care physician and the use of advance directives.
Doukas DJ; Brody H
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1992; 5(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 1575072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nancy Cruzan in China.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nancy Beth Cruzan: in no voice at all.
Wolf SM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 2312269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The free exercise clause, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and the right to active and passive euthanasia.
Smolin DM
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(1):3-54. PubMed ID: 8077102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Living wills and the right to die.
Wallach SJ; Crabtree JP
Hawaii Med J; 1990 Dec; 49(12):461-4. PubMed ID: 2286520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What does Cruzan mean to the practicing physician?
White BD; Siegler M; Singer PA; Iserson KV
Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):925-8. PubMed ID: 2025139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Life and death choices after Cruzan: case law and standards of professional conduct.
Gostin L; Weir RF
Milbank Q; 1991; 69(1):143-73. PubMed ID: 2034182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Cruzan decision: 9.5 theses for discussion.
Meilaender G
Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 16038071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative analysis of the right to die in the Netherlands and the United States after Cruzan: reassessing the right of self-determination.
DiCamillo JA
Am Univ J Int Law Policy; 1992; 7(4):807-42. PubMed ID: 12091922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
