These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8161981)

  • 21. A framework for estimating health state utility values within a discrete choice experiment: modeling risky choices.
    Robinson A; Spencer A; Moffatt P
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 25349189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble.
    Cook KF; Ashton CM; Byrne MM; Brody B; Geraci J; Giesler RB; Hanita M; Souchek J; Wray NP
    Soc Sci Med; 2001 Nov; 53(10):1275-85. PubMed ID: 11676400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preferences and person trade-offs: forcing consistency or inconsistency in health-related quality of life measures?
    Mansley EC; Elbasha EH
    Health Econ; 2003 Mar; 12(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 12605464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods.
    Ali S; Ronaldson S
    Br Med Bull; 2012 Sep; 103(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 22859714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What outcomes are important to patients with long term conditions? A discrete choice experiment.
    Richardson G; Bojke C; Kennedy A; Reeves D; Bower P; Lee V; Middleton E; Gardner C; Gately C; Rogers A
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 18647255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are decisions using cost-utility analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm?
    Pickard AS; Wang Z; Walton SM; Lee TA
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 Mar; 3():11. PubMed ID: 15748287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient preference quality of life measures in dermatology.
    McCombs K; Chen SC
    Dermatol Ther; 2007; 20(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 17537138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Advocating a Paradigm Shift in Health-State Valuations: The Estimation of Time-Preference Corrected QALY Tariffs.
    Jonker MF; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob EW; Stolk EA
    Value Health; 2018 Aug; 21(8):993-1001. PubMed ID: 30098678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Preference-Based Quality of Life Values in Coronary Heart Disease.
    Stevanović J; Pechlivanoglou P; Kampinga MA; Krabbe PF; Postma MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152030. PubMed ID: 27011260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of condition specific outcome measures in economic appraisal.
    Brazier J; Dixon S
    Health Econ; 1995; 4(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 8528428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deriving a Preference-Based Measure for Myelofibrosis from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the MF-SAF.
    Mukuria C; Rowen D; Brazier JE; Young TA; Nafees B
    Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):846-55. PubMed ID: 26409613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Health related utility measurement in rheumatology: an introduction.
    Bakker CH; Rutten-van Mölken M; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S
    Patient Educ Couns; 1993 May; 20(2-3):145-52. PubMed ID: 8337191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-utility analysis of cataract surgery in the second eye.
    Busbee BG; Brown MM; Brown GC; Sharma S
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2310-7. PubMed ID: 14644712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preferences for health outcomes and cost-utility analysis.
    Torrance GW
    Am J Manag Care; 1997 May; 3 Suppl():S8-20. PubMed ID: 10180342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A utility-theoretic model for QALYs and willingness to pay.
    Klose T
    Health Econ; 2003 Jan; 12(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 12483758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The reliability of cost-utility estimates in cost-per-QALY league tables .
    Petrou S; Malek M; Davey PG
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1993 May; 3(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 10146885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Health Condition Impacts in a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Vary Substantially by Preference-Based Health Index.
    Hanmer J; Cherepanov D; Palta M; Kaplan RM; Feeny D; Fryback DG
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 26314728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of a Preference-Based Summary Score for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: The PROMIS
    Dewitt B; Feeny D; Fischhoff B; Cella D; Hays RD; Hess R; Pilkonis PA; Revicki DA; Roberts MS; Tsevat J; Yu L; Hanmer J
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):683-698. PubMed ID: 29944456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.
    Netten A; Burge P; Malley J; Potoglou D; Towers AM; Brazier J; Flynn T; Forder J; Wall B
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(16):1-166. PubMed ID: 22459668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost utility analysis: 'new directions' in setting health care priorities.
    Richardson J; Cook J
    Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 10119046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.