These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8161982)
1. Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life. Revicki DA; Kaplan RM Qual Life Res; 1993 Dec; 2(6):477-87. PubMed ID: 8161982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between health utility and psychometric health status measures. Revicki DA Med Care; 1992 May; 30(5 Suppl):MS274-82. PubMed ID: 1583939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association between preference-based health-related quality of life and asthma severity. Moy ML; Fuhlbrigge AL; Blumenschein K; Chapman RH; Zillich AJ; Kuntz KM; Paltiel AD; Kitch BT; Weiss ST; Neumann PJ Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2004 Mar; 92(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 15049396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health State Utilities for Patient's Current Health from Bipolar Type I Disorder. Banihashemian M; Rashidian A; Gholamian F; Parsaeian M; Moradi N; Amini H J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 29643263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preference-based measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in children with chronic musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs). Brunner HI; Maker D; Grundland B; Young NL; Blanchette V; Stain AM; Feldman BM Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 12926581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures. Kaplan RM; Feeny D; Revicki DA Qual Life Res; 1993 Dec; 2(6):467-75. PubMed ID: 8161981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient utilities in chronic musculoskeletal pain: how useful is the standard gamble method? Goossens ME; Vlaeyen JW; Rutten-van Mölken MP; van der Linden SM Pain; 1999 Mar; 80(1-2):365-75. PubMed ID: 10204750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can health utility measures be used in lupus research? A comparative validation and reliability study of 4 utility indices. Moore AD; Clarke AE; Danoff DS; Joseph L; Bélisle P; Neville C; Fortin PR J Rheumatol; 1999 Jun; 26(6):1285-90. PubMed ID: 10381044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient utilities in fibromyalgia and the association with other outcome measures. Bakker C; Rutten M; van Santen-Hoeufft M; Bolwijn P; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S J Rheumatol; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1536-43. PubMed ID: 7473480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary. In Praise of Studies That Use More Than One Generic Preference-Based Measure. Feeny D; Furlong W; Torrance GW Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019; 35(4):257-262. PubMed ID: 31296277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preferences for health outcomes and cost-utility analysis. Torrance GW Am J Manag Care; 1997 May; 3 Suppl():S8-20. PubMed ID: 10180342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Swedish population-based study on the relationship between the SF-36 and health utilities to measure health in hypertension. Bardage C; Isacson D; Ring L; Bingefors K Blood Press; 2003; 12(4):203-10. PubMed ID: 14596356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preference-based quality of life in patients with cerebral aneurysms. King JT; Tsevat J; Roberts MS Stroke; 2005 Feb; 36(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 15653579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment. Jansen SJ; Stiggelbout AM; Nooij MA; Kievit J Qual Life Res; 2000; 9(5):541-57. PubMed ID: 11190009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of two multiattribute utility measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Stavem K Qual Life Res; 1999; 8(1-2):45-54. PubMed ID: 10457737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble. Cook KF; Ashton CM; Byrne MM; Brody B; Geraci J; Giesler RB; Hanita M; Souchek J; Wray NP Soc Sci Med; 2001 Nov; 53(10):1275-85. PubMed ID: 11676400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey. Flood C; Barlow S; Simpson A; Burls A; Price A; Cartwright M; Brini S; PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205223. PubMed ID: 30352071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of respondent acceptability for preference measures in stuttering. Franic DM; Bothe AK; Bramlett RE J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(5):378-89. PubMed ID: 22682377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of life in epilepsy: comparison of four preference measures. Stavem K Epilepsy Res; 1998 Feb; 29(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 9551782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]