These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8161982)

  • 21. Preference-based approaches to measuring the benefits of perinatal care.
    Petrou S; Henderson J
    Birth; 2003 Dec; 30(4):217-26. PubMed ID: 14992152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relationship between descriptive and valuational quality-of-life measures in patients with intermittent claudication.
    Bosch JL; Hunink MG
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 8818119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Valuing Treatments for Parkinson Disease Incorporating Process Utility: Performance of Best-Worst Scaling, Time Trade-Off, and Visual Analogue Scales.
    Weernink MG; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; IJzerman MJ; van Til JA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 27021757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life.
    Lenert L; Kaplan RM
    Med Care; 2000 Sep; 38(9 Suppl):II138-50. PubMed ID: 10982099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Lin MR; Yu WY; Wang SC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22289233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The standard gamble showed better construct validity than the time trade-off.
    Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Wong E; Griffith L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 60(10):1029-33. PubMed ID: 17884597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sagittal craniosynostosis: a utility outcomes study.
    Kuta V; McNeely PD; Walling S; Bezuhly M
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 20(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 28524791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The utility assessment method order influences measurement of parents' risk attitude.
    Finnell SM; Carroll AE; Downs SM
    Value Health; 2012; 15(6):926-32. PubMed ID: 22999143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of a Preference-Based Summary Score for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: The PROMIS
    Dewitt B; Feeny D; Fischhoff B; Cella D; Hays RD; Hess R; Pilkonis PA; Revicki DA; Roberts MS; Tsevat J; Yu L; Hanmer J
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):683-698. PubMed ID: 29944456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing the performance of utility techniques in the absence of a gold standard.
    Giesler RB; Ashton CM; Brody B; Byrne MM; Cook K; Geraci JM; Hanita M; Souchek J; Wray NP
    Med Care; 1999 Jun; 37(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 10386570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries.
    Lin MR; Hwang HF; Chung KP; Huang C; Chen CY
    Phys Ther; 2006 Mar; 86(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 16506870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The construction of standard gamble utilities.
    van Osch SM; Stiggelbout AM
    Health Econ; 2008 Jan; 17(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 17410521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A review of health-utility data for osteoarthritis: implications for clinical trial-based evaluation.
    Ruchlin HS; Insinga RP
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(11):925-35. PubMed ID: 18850762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing the psychometric properties of preference-based and nonpreference-based health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease. Canadian Collaborative Cardiac Assessment Group.
    Lalonde L; Clarke AE; Joseph L; Mackenzie T; Grover SA
    Qual Life Res; 1999 Aug; 8(5):399-409. PubMed ID: 10474281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.
    Feeny D; Furlong W; Torrance GW; Goldsmith CH; Zhu Z; DePauw S; Denton M; Boyle M
    Med Care; 2002 Feb; 40(2):113-28. PubMed ID: 11802084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer.
    Meregaglia M; Cairns J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 15(1):174. PubMed ID: 28865475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pain quality of life as measured by utilities.
    Wetherington S; Delong L; Kini S; Veledar E; Schaufele MK; McKenzie-Brown AM; Chen SC
    Pain Med; 2014 May; 15(5):865-70. PubMed ID: 24716656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measurement and comparison of health utility assessments in chronic rhinosinusitis.
    Ference EH; Stubbs V; Lidder AK; Chandra RK; Conley D; Avila PC; Hirsch AG; Min JY; Smith SS; Kern RC; Tan BK
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2015 Oct; 5(10):929-36. PubMed ID: 26077390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Health values of patients with systemic sclerosis.
    Khanna D; Ahmed M; Furst DE; Ginsburg SS; Park GS; Hornung R; Tsevat J
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Feb; 57(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17266070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patient utilities in ankylosing spondylitis and the association with other outcome measures.
    Bakker C; Rutten-van Mölken M; Hidding A; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1298-304. PubMed ID: 7966073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.