348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8162209)
1. Comparison of the causes of late death following aortic and mitral valve replacement. VA Co-operative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.
Hwang MH; Burchfiel CM; Sethi GK; Oprian C; Grover FL; Henderson WG; Hammermeister K
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8162209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of the carbomedics prosthesis: experience at providence health system in Portland.
Minakata K; Wu Y; Zerr KJ; Grunkemeier GL; Handy JR; Ahmad A; Starr A; Furnary AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):844-50. PubMed ID: 12479287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early clinical experience with the On-X prosthetic heart valve.
Laczkovics A; Heidt M; Oelert H; Laufer G; Greve H; Pomar JL; Mohr FW; Haverich A; Birnbaum D; Regensburger D; Palatianos G; Wolner E
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 11206775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; Jones DJ; Nicoloff DM; Blake DP; Arom KV
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar; 13(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 15086262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative clinical outcomes with St. Jude Medical, Medtronic Hall and CarboMedics mechanical heart valves.
Masters RG; Helou J; Pipe AL; Keon WJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 11380109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term experience with the omniscience cardiac valve.
Teijeira FJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):540-7. PubMed ID: 9793854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Ultracor tilting disc heart valve prosthesis: a seven-year study.
Li HH; Jeffrey RR; Davidson KG; Seifert D; Körfer R; Grunkemeier GL
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Nov; 7(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 9870199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Six years' experience with the Omnicarbon valve prosthesis.
Otaki M; Kitamura N
Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Oct; 1(5):594-8. PubMed ID: 8076103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mid-term results after Epic xenograft implantation for aortic, mitral, and double valve replacement.
Lehmann S; Walther T; Leontjev S; Kempfert J; Rastan A; Garbade J; Borger MA; Falk V; Mohr FW
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Nov; 16(6):641-8; discussion 648. PubMed ID: 18095514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Long-term clinical results after aortic valve replacement with mechanical heart valves and mitral valve replacement with porcine valves].
Okamura K; Atsumi N; Jikuya T; Sakakibara Y; Tsutsui T; Mitsui T; Hori M
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Jun; 93(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 1630439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The long-term results in multiple procedures on the heart valves].
Actis Dato GM; Actis Dato A; Nudi F; De Benedictis M; Borioni R
Minerva Cardioangiol; 1994 Jun; 42(6):275-80. PubMed ID: 7936330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Bédard P; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):425-33; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 15740951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midterm evaluation of the Sorin Bicarbon heart valve prosthesis: single-center experience.
Vitale N; Cappabianca G; Visicchio G; Fondacone C; Paradiso V; Mannatrizio G; Schinosa Lde L
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Feb; 77(2):527-31. PubMed ID: 14759432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chitra heart valve: results of a multicenter clinical study.
Sankarkumar R; Bhuvaneshwar GS; Magotra R; Muralidharan S; Rajan RS; Saha D; Subba Rao KS; Valiathan MS; Radhakrishna S; Ramani AV
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Sep; 10(5):619-27. PubMed ID: 11603602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
