These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8162222)

  • 1. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the size 19mm and 21mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus Bileaflet Heart valves.
    Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 8162222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves.
    Reul H; van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Schmitz B; Schmidt A; Schmitz C; Rau G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
    Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early in vivo experience with the Hemodynamic Plus St. Jude Medical heart valves in patients with narrowed aortic annulus.
    Carrel T; Zingg U; Jenni R; Aeschbacher B; Turina MI
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 May; 61(5):1418-22. PubMed ID: 8633952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position].
    Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C
    Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of six size 19 mm bileaflet heart valves.
    Fisher J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1995; 9(12):692-5 discussion 695-6. PubMed ID: 8703490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro evaluation of the long-body On-X bileaflet heart valve.
    Hwang NH; Reul H; Reinhard P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 9793857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of heart rate on the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical heart valves' prostheses (St. Jude Medical) in the aortic position and in the opening phase: A computational study.
    Jahandardoost M; Fradet G; Mohammadi H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Mar; 230(3):175-90. PubMed ID: 26786673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the CarboMedics valve.
    Butterfield M; Fisher J; Davies GA; Spyt TJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1991 Oct; 52(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 1929635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early experience with the new Masters series of St. Jude Medical heart valve: in vivo hemodynamic and clinical results in patients with narrowed aortic annulus.
    Zingg U; Aeschbacher B; Seiler C; Althaus U; Carrel T
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Sep; 6(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 9330177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
    Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements.
    Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Autschbach R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 16901053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The new St. Jude Medical regent mechanical heart valve: laboratory measurements of hydrodynamic performance.
    Walker DK; Brendzel AM; Scotten LN
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):687-96. PubMed ID: 10616249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of hemodynamic performance of Medtronic Hall 21 mm versus St. Jude Medical 23 mm prostheses in pigs.
    Kleine P; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Scherer M; Simon A; Moritz A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):857-63. PubMed ID: 12479289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pulsatile flow past St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve. An in vitro study.
    Chandran KB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 May; 89(5):743-9. PubMed ID: 3990323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fluid dynamics of the CarboMedics kinetic bileaflet prosthetic heart valve.
    Baldwin JT; Campbell A; Luck C; Ogilvie W; Sauter J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Feb; 11(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 9080157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.