422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8162713)
1. The pathology of intra-uterine contraceptive devices.
Buckley CH
Curr Top Pathol; 1994; 86():307-30. PubMed ID: 8162713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postpartum IUDS: keys for success.
O'Hanley K; Huber DH
Contraception; 1992 Apr; 45(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 1516367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hormonal intrauterine devices.
Rybo G; Andersson K; Odlind V
Ann Med; 1993 Apr; 25(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 8489751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fertility after contraception or abortion.
Huggins GR; Cullins VE
Fertil Steril; 1990 Oct; 54(4):559-73. PubMed ID: 2209874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Steroid intra-uterine contraception: progesterone-releasing devices. II. Insertion, clinical problems and contraceptive dependability].
Custo GM; Cosmi EV
Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1984; 12(4):331-43. PubMed ID: 12340352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices on colonisation of the cervix by actinomyces-like organisms.
Mao K; Guillebaud J
Contraception; 1984 Dec; 30(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 6529911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current status of contraceptive steroids and the intrauterine device.
Mishell DR
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Mar; 17(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 4596680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrauterine contraceptive devices. Complications associated with their use.
Nagel TC
Postgrad Med; 1983 Mar; 73(3):155-64. PubMed ID: 6828391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endometrial morphological changes in IUD users: a review.
Sheppard BL
Contraception; 1987 Jul; 36(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3117492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
Chi IC
Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of a copper intra-uterine contraceptive device on the microbial ecology of the female genital tract.
Elhag KM; Bahar AM; Mubarak AA
J Med Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 25(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 3357191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting intrauterine contraceptive device performance. I. Endometrial cavity length.
Hasson HM; Berger GS; Edelman DA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Dec; 126(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 998687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
French R; Van Vliet H; Cowan F; Mansour D; Morris S; Hughes D; Robinson A; Proctor T; Summerbell C; Logan S; Helmerhorst F; Guillebaud J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; 2004(3):CD001776. PubMed ID: 15266453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs).
International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 21(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 12268853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Five years private practice experience of nulliparous women using copper IUD's.
Smith RP; Goresky DM; Etchell DM
Contraception; 1980 Apr; 21(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 7389354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception.
Black A; Guilbert E; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman W; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; Mansouri S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):182-222. PubMed ID: 27032746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study on the clinical effects and endometrial findings of IUD].
Chao CK
Toho Igakkai Zasshi; 1988 Mar; 34(6):550-60. PubMed ID: 12343145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current status of intrauterine devices. II. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy.
Malhotra N; Chaudhury RR
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1982 Jan; 37(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7054735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intrauterine devices: present and future.
Guillebaud J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1980; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 6110576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
