These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8163280)

  • 1. Effects of three types of flight simulator visual scene detail on detection of altitude change.
    Kleiss JA; Hubbard DC
    Hum Factors; 1993 Dec; 35(4):653-71. PubMed ID: 8163280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual scene properties relevant for simulating low-altitude flight: a multidimensional scaling approach.
    Kleiss JA
    Hum Factors; 1995 Dec; 37(4):711-34. PubMed ID: 8851775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of visual occlusion in altitude maintenance during simulated flight.
    Gray R; Geri GA; Akhtar SC; Covas CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):475-88. PubMed ID: 18377183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the influence of operational factors on the perceived structure of real-world scenes viewed during low-altitude, high-speed flight.
    Kleiss JA
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(4):335-58. PubMed ID: 11540401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guidance of attention to objects and locations by long-term memory of natural scenes.
    Becker MW; Rasmussen IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1325-38. PubMed ID: 18980397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):396-411. PubMed ID: 15910127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 17311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explicit and implicit horizons for simulated landing approaches.
    Lintern G; Liu YT
    Hum Factors; 1991 Aug; 33(4):401-17. PubMed ID: 1955202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects.
    Walther D; Koch C
    Neural Netw; 2006 Nov; 19(9):1395-407. PubMed ID: 17098563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hysteresis in the dynamic perception of scenes and objects.
    Poltoratski S; Tong F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Oct; 143(5):1875-92. PubMed ID: 25150947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The scene and the unseen: manipulating photographs for experiments on change blindness and scene memory: image manipulation for change blindness.
    Ball F; Elzemann A; Busch NA
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):689-701. PubMed ID: 24311058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes.
    Hansen BC; Essock EA
    J Vis; 2004 Dec; 4(12):1044-60. PubMed ID: 15669910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An experimental study of pilots' control characteristics for flight of an STOL aircraft in backside of drag curve at approach and landing.
    Ema T
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(5-6):541-50. PubMed ID: 1612055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception.
    Henderson JM; Hollingworth A
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 12930482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low-level visual saliency does not predict change detection in natural scenes.
    Stirk JA; Underwood G
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):3.1-10. PubMed ID: 17997672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of scenery, lighting, glideslope, and experience on timing the landing flare.
    Palmisano S; Favelle S; Sachtler WL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):236-46. PubMed ID: 18808277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects.
    Flombaum JI; Scholl BJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):840-53. PubMed ID: 16846283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gaze cues influence the allocation of attention in natural scene viewing.
    Langton SR; O'Donnell C; Riby DM; Ballantyne CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Dec; 59(12):2056-64. PubMed ID: 17095487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial scene representations formed by self-organizing learning in a hippocampal extension of the ventral visual system.
    Rolls ET; Tromans JM; Stringer SM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 28(10):2116-27. PubMed ID: 19046392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.