BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8163290)

  • 1. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1: Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8163290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 2: Relationship between affected sib-pair tests and lod score analysis.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 8163291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power of affected sibling method tests for linkage.
    Tierney C; McKnight B
    Hum Hered; 1993; 43(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 8406516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A robust identity-by-descent procedure using affected sib pairs: multipoint mapping for complex diseases.
    Liang KY; Chiu YF; Beaty TH
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(1-2):64-78. PubMed ID: 11096273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A note on linkage analysis with affected sib triplets.
    Knapp M
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 15802918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-locus disease models with two marker loci: the power of affected-sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Nov; 55(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 7977340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal ascertainment strategies to detect linkage to common disease alleles.
    Badner JA; Gershon ES; Goldin LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Sep; 63(3):880-8. PubMed ID: 9718337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating linkage and linkage disequilibrium: use of excess sharing and transmission disequilibrium methods in affected sib pairs.
    Wicks J; Wilson SR
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 64(Pt 5):419-32. PubMed ID: 11281280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some epistatic two-locus models of disease. I. Relative risks and identity-by-descent distributions in affected sib pairs.
    Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1981 May; 33(3):381-95. PubMed ID: 6941695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consanguinity and the sib-pair method: an approach using identity by descent between and within individuals.
    GĂ©nin E; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Nov; 59(5):1149-62. PubMed ID: 8900245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage.
    Suarez BK; Rice J; Reich T
    Ann Hum Genet; 1978 Jul; 42(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 686687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power of sib-pair and sib-trio linkage analysis with assortative mating and multiple disease loci.
    Sribney WM; Swift M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Oct; 51(4):773-84. PubMed ID: 1415221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits.
    Kruglyak L; Lander ES
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Aug; 57(2):439-54. PubMed ID: 7668271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A test statistic to detect errors in sib-pair relationships.
    Ehm M; Wagner M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Jan; 62(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 9443861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multipoint analysis using affected sib pairs: incorporating linkage evidence from unlinked regions.
    Liang KY; Chiu YF; Beaty TH; Wjst M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Sep; 21(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 11507720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families.
    Martin ER; Kaplan NL; Weir BS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Aug; 61(2):439-48. PubMed ID: 9311750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.