BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8163290)

  • 21. Hidden linkage: a comparison of the affected sib pair (ASP) test and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT).
    McGinnis RE
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Mar; 62(Pt 2):159-79. PubMed ID: 9759477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs.
    Risch N
    Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Feb; 46(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 2301393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ASP--a simulation-based power calculator for genetic linkage studies of qualitative traits, using sib-pairs.
    Krawczak M
    Hum Genet; 2001 Dec; 109(6):675-7. PubMed ID: 11810280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.
    Leal SM; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 10677317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Statistical properties of affected sib-pair linkage tests.
    Wu CC; Amos CI
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(4):153-62. PubMed ID: 14566093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficient intermediate fine mapping: confidence set inference with likelihood ratio test statistic.
    Sinha R; Luo Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):922-36. PubMed ID: 17615574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis I: use of the mean statistic for affected sib pairs.
    Guo X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 10642424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The affected-/discordant-sib-pair design can guarantee validity of multipoint model-free linkage analysis of incomplete pedigrees when there is marker-marker disequilibrium.
    Xing C; Sinha R; Xing G; Lu Q; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Aug; 79(2):396-401. PubMed ID: 16826532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Partitioned association-linkage test: distinguishing "necessary" from "susceptibility" loci.
    Greenberg DA; Doneshka P
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 8797007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Power calculations for a general class of tests of linkage and association that use nuclear families with affected and unaffected sibs.
    Kaplan NL; Martin ER
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 11855953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Linkage and association to genetic markers.
    Elston RC
    Exp Clin Immunogenet; 1995; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 8534500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs.
    Schaid DJ; Elston RC; Tran L; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 10861895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing the power of linkage detection by the transmission disequilibrium test and the identity-by-descent test.
    Clerget-Darpoux F; Babron MC; Bickeböller H
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 8787977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Construction of a confidence set of markers for the location of a disease gene using affected sib pair data.
    Lin S
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 12037409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On a test of non-random segregation under linkage for autosomal recessive diseases.
    Pal N; Majumder PP
    Stat Med; 1990 May; 9(5):573-82. PubMed ID: 2349406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of marker information on sib-pair linkage analysis of a rare disease.
    Korczak JF; Pugh EW; Premkumar S; Guo X; Elston RC; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):625-30. PubMed ID: 8787984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci: common tests vs. the asymptotically most powerful test.
    Schaid DJ; Nick TG
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 2253870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Affected sib-pair tests for linkage: type I errors with dependent sib-pairs.
    Meunier F; Philippi A; Martinez M; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9433632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Power and type I error in affected sib-pair methods under restricted estimation conditions.
    Dawson DV; Kaplan EB
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 329():189-94. PubMed ID: 2622952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of age at onset on the power of the affected sib pair and transmission/disequilibrium tests.
    Li H; Hsu L
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 May; 64(Pt 3):239-54. PubMed ID: 11246475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.