135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8163861)
1. A comparative in vitro study on fixation of sagittal split osteotomies with Würzburg screws, Champy miniplates, and Biofix (biodegradable) rods.
Bouwman JP; Tuinzing DB; Kostense PJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1994 Feb; 23(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 8163861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of screw versus plate fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
Foley WL; Beckman TW
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1992; 7(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 1291608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stabilization of the short sagittal split osteotomy: in vitro testing of different plate and screw configurations.
Hammer B; Ettlin D; Rahn B; Prein J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1995 Oct; 23(5):321-4. PubMed ID: 8530709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.
Chung IH; Yoo CK; Lee EK; Ihm JA; Park CJ; Lim JS; Hwang KG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 18280376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skeletal stability following sagittal split osteotomy using monocortical miniplate internal fixation.
Rubens BC; Stoelinga PJ; Blijdorp PA; Schoenaers JH; Politis C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1988 Dec; 17(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 3145953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
Peterson GP; Haug RH; Van Sickels J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1317-24. PubMed ID: 16122596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographic stereophotogrammetric evaluation of intersegmental stability after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy and rigid fixation.
Wall G; Rosenquist B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 59(12):1427-35; discussion 1435-6. PubMed ID: 11732029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental analysis of functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies secured by miniplates and position screws.
Shetty V; Freymiller E; McBrearty D; Caputo AA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Nov; 54(11):1317-24; discussion 1324-6. PubMed ID: 8941183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of inferior alveolar disturbance restoration after sagittal split osteotomy by means of bicortical versus monocortical osteosynthesis.
Fujioka M; Hirano A; Fujii T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Jul; 102(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 9655405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.
Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandibular anatomy as it relates to rigid fixation of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy.
Smith BR; Rajchel JL; Waite DE; Read L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Mar; 49(3):222-6; discussion 227. PubMed ID: 1995810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in sagittal split ramus osteotomies.
Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kılınc Y; Arslan M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 26755233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of stability of 2.0 mm standard and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screws for the fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on sheep mandibles.
Oguz Y; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D; Uckan S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 20226575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular, sagittal split osteotomies fixed with biodegradable or titanium screws: a prospective, comparative study of postoperative stability.
Ferretti C; Reyneke JP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):534-7. PubMed ID: 12075201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15749208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neurosensory deficit following mandibular sagittal split osteotomy: A comparative study between positional screws and miniplates fixation.
Yeo XH; Ayoub A; Lee C; Byrne N; Currie WRJ
Surgeon; 2017 Oct; 15(5):278-281. PubMed ID: 27522455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The incidence of postoperative wound healing problems following sagittal ramus osteotomies stabilized with miniplates and monocortical screws.
Alpha C; O'Ryan F; Silva A; Poor D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):659-68. PubMed ID: 16546646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
