These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8164168)

  • 1. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Kinderknecht KE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Mar; 71(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8164168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical factors and clinical variation influencing the reproducibility of interocclusal recording methods.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O
    Br Dent J; 2002 Apr; 192(7):395-400; discussion 391. PubMed ID: 12017459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interocclusal record fabricated with bis-acrylic composite resin and vinyl polysiloxane registration material.
    Vivas JL; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19703631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of interocclusal recording for mandibular removable partial denture in bilateral distal extension cases.
    Togano H; Hideshima M; Ohyama T
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Mar; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12715920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships.
    Campos AA; Nathanson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 10512966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility.
    Hatzi P; Millstein P; Maya A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11264930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):816-20. PubMed ID: 18482345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study.
    Tejo SK; Kumar AG; Kattimani VS; Desai PD; Nalla S; Chaitanya K K
    Head Face Med; 2012 Oct; 8():27. PubMed ID: 23039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 1494111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical evaluation of materials for interocclusal registration in centric relation.
    Pagnano VO; Bezzon OL; de Mattos MG; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11213793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of loading forces on the vertical accuracy of interocclusal records.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Feb; 41(2):e31-5. PubMed ID: 20165738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records.
    Vergos VK; Tripodakis AP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 12956489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of the rheological properties of several interocclusal registration materials.
    Chai J; Leong DK; Pang IC
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Sep; 3(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 7874254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models.
    Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Materials for interocclusal records and their ability to reproduce a 3-dimensional jaw relationship.
    Ockert-Eriksson G; Eriksson A; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11203625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The acrylic resin transfer coping technique for making accurate interocclusal records.
    Antonelli J; Hottel TL; Siegel SC; Darnell L
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2011; 91(2):17-21; quiz 22-3. PubMed ID: 21748975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.
    DeLong R; Knorr S; Anderson GC; Hodges J; Pintado MR
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 17418474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compressive strength of interocclusal recording materials.
    Keyf F; Altunsoy S
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 11210251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.