These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8164168)

  • 21.
    Sonkesriya S; Subramanian D; Saha P; Roy P; Panda S; Reddy U; Baig MM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Dec; 24(12):936-939. PubMed ID: 38317389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A study of interocclusal record materials.
    Mullick SC; Stackhouse JA; Vincent GR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Sep; 46(3):304-7. PubMed ID: 6943339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part I: Plaster, impression compound, and wax.
    Müller J; Götz G; Hörz W; Kraft E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 2308087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fabrication of a custom incisal guide table with vinyl polysiloxane.
    Chen EY; Plummer KD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):126-7. PubMed ID: 19643227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An In Vitro Study of Condylar Displacement Caused by Interocclusal Records: Influence of Recording Material, Storage Time, and Recording Technique.
    Ghazal M; Hedderich J; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):587-593. PubMed ID: 26833815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal recording materials.
    Ghazal M; Ludwig K; Habil RN; Kern M
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Oct; 39(9):727-32. PubMed ID: 19093044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
    Buzayan M; Baig MR; Yunus N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new electromechanical device to measure the accuracy of interocclusal records.
    Assif D; Himel R; Grajower Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Jun; 59(6):672-6. PubMed ID: 3165452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An experimental study of vertical deviations induced by different interocclusal recording materials.
    Müller J; Götz G; Bruckner G; Kraft E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 2033543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiographic Appearance of Interocclusal Record Materials for Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Implant Surgeries.
    Mohunta VV; McGlumphy EA; Kim DG; Azer SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):489-495. PubMed ID: 28494032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mounting partially edentulous casts.
    McGill ST; Holmes JR
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):592-5. PubMed ID: 20945752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An interocclusal record made of a combination of wax and acrylic resin.
    Bezzon OL; Orsi IA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Sep; 72(3):334-6. PubMed ID: 7965910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interocclusal registration technique with a vacuum-formed matrix.
    Curtis SR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):308-9. PubMed ID: 12942068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fabricating a stable record base for completely edentulous patients treated with osseointegrated implants using healing abutments.
    Rungcharassaeng K; Kan JY
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Feb; 81(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 9922438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interocclusal Records in Fixed Prosthodontics.
    Thanabalan N; Amin K; Butt K; Bourne G
    Prim Dent J; 2019 Nov; 8(3):40-47. PubMed ID: 31666172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of check-bite registration and centric condylar position.
    Utz KH; Müller F; Lückerath W; Fuss E; Koeck B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 May; 29(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 12028494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques.
    Parker MH; Cameron SM; Hughbanks JC; Reid DE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 9297641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intraoral acrylic resin coping fabrication for making interocclusal records.
    Stamoulis K
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 19138356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability.
    Kitzis GD; Millstein PL; Nathanson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):845-8. PubMed ID: 2072333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.