These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8164307)

  • 21. Safe, timely, convenient, and cost-effective: a single-center experience with bedside placement of enteral feeding tubes by midlevel providers using fluoroscopic guidance.
    Hauschild TB; Fu KY; Hipwell RC; Baraghoshi G; Mone MC; Nirula R; Kimball EJ; Barton RG
    Am J Surg; 2012 Dec; 204(6):958-62; discussion 962. PubMed ID: 23022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. pH and concentration of bilirubin in feeding tube aspirates as predictors of tube placement.
    Metheny NA; Stewart BJ; Smith L; Yan H; Diebold M; Clouse RE
    Nurs Res; 1999; 48(4):189-97. PubMed ID: 10414681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does the use of an enteral feeding tube with a pH-sensitive tip facilitate enteral nutrition?
    Ireton-Jones CS; Cheney J; Young R; Hunt J; Purdue G
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1993; 14(2 Pt 1):215-7. PubMed ID: 8501112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implementation of an electromagnetic imaging system to facilitate nasogastric and post-pyloric feeding tube placement in patients with and without critical illness.
    Windle EM; Beddow D; Hall E; Wright J; Sundar N
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2010 Feb; 23(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 19843199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of a reliable and valid bedside test for bilirubin and its utility for improving prediction of feeding tube location.
    Metheny NA; Smith L; Stewart BJ
    Nurs Res; 2000; 49(6):302-9. PubMed ID: 11093694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enteral nutrition delivery technique.
    Gopalan S; Khanna S
    Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care; 2003 May; 6(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 12690265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hold that x-ray: aspirate pH and auscultation prove enteral tube placement.
    Neumann MJ; Meyer CT; Dutton JL; Smith R
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 1995 Jun; 20(4):293-5. PubMed ID: 7665817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nasointestinal intubation with tiger tubes: a case series indicates risk of mucosal damage.
    Taylor SJ; Pullyblank A; Manara A
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2006 Apr; 19(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 16533377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of weighted vs unweighted enteral feeding tubes for efficacy of transpyloric intubation.
    Lord LM; Weiser-Maimone A; Pulhamus M; Sax HC
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1993; 17(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 8505833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enteral nutrition during the treatment of head and neck carcinoma: is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube preferable to a nasogastric tube?
    Mekhail TM; Adelstein DJ; Rybicki LA; Larto MA; Saxton JP; Lavertu P
    Cancer; 2001 May; 91(9):1785-90. PubMed ID: 11335904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Percutaneous endoscopic stomas for enteral feeding and drainage.
    Shike M
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1995 Jan; 9(1):39-44; discussion 44, 47. PubMed ID: 7718440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electromagnetic-Guided Versus Endoscopic Placement of Nasojejunal Feeding Tubes After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Prospective Pilot Study.
    Gerritsen A; Duflou A; Ramali M; Busch OR; Gouma DJ; van Gulik TM; Nieveen van Dijkum EJ; Mathus-Vliegen EM; Besselink MG
    Pancreas; 2016 Feb; 45(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 26390422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Value of nasojejunal nutrition in the treatment of children with acute pancreatitis].
    Ma M; Chen J; Li FB; Lou JG; Peng KR; Zhao H; Chen FB
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 51(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 23527981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Blind bedside placement of postpyloric feeding tubes by registered dietitians: success rates, outcomes, and cost effectiveness.
    Rollins CM
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 28(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 23748740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Colocutaneous fistula as a complication of PEG tube placement.
    Kilmartin C; Brotzman GL; Regan P
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Jul; 43(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 8691184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Group I: choosing the appropriate method of placement of an enteral feeding tube in the high-risk population.
    Lipman TO; Cass OW; Ho CS; Kearns PJ; Shikora SA
    Nutr Clin Pract; 1997 Feb; 12(1 Suppl):S54-5. PubMed ID: 9077235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prophylactic locking of enteral feeding tubes with pancreatic enzymes.
    Sriram K; Jayanthi V; Lakshmi RG; George VS
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1997; 21(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 9406135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simplify the technique of nasoenteric feeding tube placement with a modified suture tie.
    Chang WK; McClave SA; Chao YC
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Jan; 39(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 15599210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Endoscopic nasoenteral feeding tube placement following cardiothoracic surgery.
    Vaswani SK; Clarkston WK
    Am Surg; 1996 May; 62(5):421-3. PubMed ID: 8615577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Endoscopic placement of feeding tubes in the critically ill patient.
    Pleatman MA; Naunheim KS
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Jul; 165(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 3109047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.