These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8164623)

  • 1. [The marginal leakage of amalgam and Vitrebond restorations after an occlusal load test].
    Toschi E; Ruggeri O; Semprini P; Montanari MC; Prati C
    Minerva Stomatol; 1993; 42(11-12):487-90. PubMed ID: 8164623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early in vitro marginal microleakage associated with different lining materials under Class II amalgam restorations.
    Youngson CC; Holguin SM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Dec; 1(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1306739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage in alloy-glass ionomer lined amalgam restorations after thermocycling.
    Arcoria CJ; Fisher MA; Wagner MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Jan; 18(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 2051252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage under amalgam restorations lined with Copalite, Amalgambond Plus, and Vitrebond.
    Newman JE; Hondrum SO; Clem DB
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 8957830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations.
    Rabchinsky J; Donly KJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations pretreated with various liners.
    Tjan AH; Tan DE; Sun JC; Tjan AH
    Am J Dent; 1997 Dec; 10(6):284-6. PubMed ID: 9590917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.
    Wibowo G; Stockton L
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage around bonded amalgam coronal-radicular cores in endodontically treated molar teeth.
    Howdle MD; Fox K; Youngson CC
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 11887532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative microleakage evaluation around amalgam restorations with different treatments on cavity walls.
    de Morais PM; Rodrigues Júnior AL; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 10823067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of dentin/amalgam alloy bonding agents: results after 1 year.
    Meiers JC; Turner EW
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9610330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of base/liner use on restoration leakage.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Marshall KR; Holman BG
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 16689065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical considerations concerning glass ionomer cements used for basing amalgam restorations.
    O'Hara JW; McManus DB
    Compendium; 1990 Mar; 11(3):130, 132, 134-6. PubMed ID: 2376065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.