These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8164948)

  • 21. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A randomized clinical trial comparing misoprostol with prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Gottschall DS; Borgida AF; Mihalek JJ; Sauer F; Rodis JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 177(5):1067-70. PubMed ID: 9396895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of intravaginal misoprostol 0.2 mg versus intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg doses for labor induction at term pregnancies.
    Górnisiewicz T; Jaworowski A; Zembala-Szczerba M; Babczyk D; Huras H
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(6):320-324. PubMed ID: 28727132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Vaginal misoprostol for term labor induction.
    Bauer TA; Brown DL; Chai LK
    Ann Pharmacother; 1997 Nov; 31(11):1391-3. PubMed ID: 9391696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intravaginal misoprostol vs. dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
    Elhassan M; Mirghani OA; Adam I
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Jun; 85(3):285-6. PubMed ID: 15145271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dinoprostone cervical gel.
    Noah ML
    West J Med; 1994 Jan; 160(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 8128717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy.
    Preutthipan S; Herabutya Y
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Oct; 86(4):990-4. PubMed ID: 16949590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Ripening of the cervix uteri and stimulation of labor with a prostaglandin E2 gel. A comparison of intracervical and intravaginal administration].
    Okland O; Eik-Nes SH; Lamborg B; Braenne H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1986 Nov; 106(32):2728-30, 2745. PubMed ID: 3468667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening in the third trimester of pregnancy].
    Wang Z; Li W; Ouyang W
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Jun; 32(6):326-8. PubMed ID: 9596908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Medical indications of labor induction: a comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and intravenous prostaglandin E2].
    Jouatte F; Subtil D; Marquis P; Plennevaux JL; Puech F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Dec; 29(8):763-771. PubMed ID: 11139713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
    Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
    BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Sénat MV; Bretelle F; Paule Bonnal A; Ville Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 15295374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Therapeutic considerations for preinduction cervical ripening with intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel.
    Bernstein EP
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Jan; 38(1 Suppl):73-7. PubMed ID: 8429530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of glyceryl trinitrate, misoprostol, and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening in term pregnancy.
    Sharma Y; Kumar S; Mittal S; Misra R; Dadhwal V
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Jun; 31(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 15916656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Study of the effect of Propess for ripening of the unfavorable cervix for the induction of labor due to medical indications].
    Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; Krŭsteva K; Nashar S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 12858482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.