133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8165921)
1. Spatial S-R compatibility: positional instruction vs. compatibility instruction.
Heister G; Schroeder-Heister P
Acta Psychol (Amst); 1994 Feb; 85(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 8165921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
Iacoboni M; Woods RP; Mazziotta JC
J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):321-31. PubMed ID: 8836228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disentangling sensorimotor and cognitive cardioafferent effects: A cardiac-cycle-time study on spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
Larra MF; Finke JB; Wascher E; Schächinger H
Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4059. PubMed ID: 32132629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stimulus-Response and Response-Effect Compatibility With Touchless Gestures and Moving Action Effects.
Janczyk M; Xiong A; Proctor RW
Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1297-1314. PubMed ID: 30844314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
Vu KP; Proctor RW
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reversed effect of spatial compatibility when taking avatar's perspective.
Müsseler J; Ruhland L; Böffel C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1539-1549. PubMed ID: 30134768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: right-left prevalence with bimanual responses.
Vu KP; Proctor RW; Pick DF
Psychol Res; 2000; 64(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 11109865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mental imagery yields stimulus-response compatibility.
Tlauka M; McKenna FP
Acta Psychol (Amst); 1998 Mar; 98(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 9581125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
Proctor RW; Cho YS
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial compatibility between stimulated eye and response location.
Valle-Inclán F; Sohn F; Redondo M
Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 17971057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Working-memory load decreases mappings effects in spatial-compatibility tasks.
Wühr P
Psychol Res; 2011 Sep; 75(5):393-405. PubMed ID: 21184095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of the location of ordered symbols on the ordinal position effect: The involvement of the task performed.
Shi W; Wang Q; Deng M; Xu D
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jan; 202():102978. PubMed ID: 31790912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Object affordance and spatial-compatibility effects in Parkinson's disease.
Galpin A; Tipper SP; Dick JP; Poliakoff E
Cortex; 2011 Mar; 47(3):332-41. PubMed ID: 20189167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Control-display alignment determines the prevalent compatibility effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response tasks.
Lee S; Miles JD; Vu KP
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 26169949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
